JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia https://siducat.org/index.php/jpi <p data-start="149" data-end="732"><strong data-start="149" data-end="183">JPI (Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia)</strong> is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes high-quality research and critical scholarship in the fields of language studies, education, educational management, and library and information science. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, and conceptual papers that address language learning and teaching, linguistics, learning methods and technologies, educational development, institutional management, and library and information practices across diverse linguistic, educational, and socio-cultural contexts.</p> <p data-start="734" data-end="913"><strong data-start="734" data-end="762">Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia</strong> is published in collaboration between Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu and the Association of Indonesian Language and Literature Lecturer (ADOBSI).</p> <p data-start="915" data-end="1308">JPI aims to provide an academic forum for advancing theory, research, and practice related to language, education, literacy, educational governance, and information management. The journal particularly values manuscripts that demonstrate conceptual clarity, methodological rigor, and meaningful contributions to scholarly and professional practice at local, national, and international levels.</p> <p data-start="1310" data-end="1405">&nbsp;</p> en-US <p>Authors who publish with <strong>JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia</strong>&nbsp;journal agree to the following terms:</p> <ol> <li>Authors retain copyright and grant the <strong>JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia </strong>journal&nbsp;right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under&nbsp;<strong>Creative Commons Attribution License</strong>&nbsp;<strong><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">(CC BY 4.0)</a></strong>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li> <li>Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.</li> <li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.</li> </ol> jpi@siducat.org (M. Arif Rahman Hakim) jpi@siducat.org (Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia (JPI)) Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0700 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Pleasure over pressure: Hedonic motivation, peer influence, ‎and gender in Generation Z teachers’ compulsive buying https://siducat.org/index.php/jpi/article/view/2656 <p>Compulsive buying is a growing concern among young Indonesian professionals as digital commerce expands. Peer influence, rumination, and hedonic motivation have been studied separately, but rarely together in one gender-moderated model for teachers. This cross-sectional survey examined their association with compulsive buying among Generation Z civil-servant teachers in Pesisir Selatan Regency, West Sumatra, drawing on conspicuous consumption theory and the I-PACE model. Of 731 eligible teachers holding PNS or PPPK status, 310 completed the questionnaire and were analysed with PLS-SEM in SmartPLS using a product-indicator interaction. Hedonic motivation showed the strongest association with compulsive buying (β = .775, 95% CI [.716, .834], <em>p</em> &lt; .001), followed by peer influence (β = .218, 95% CI [.129, .307], <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Rumination was not significantly associated (β = .034, 95% CI [-.053, .121]), nor was gender directly (β = .032, 95% CI [-.044, .108]) or as a moderator of any pathway. The model explained 75.5% of the variance in compulsive buying scores (adjusted <em>R</em>² = .749; <em>Q</em>² = .294). Because eligibility required at least three recent online purchases and the gender groups were unequal (243 women, 67 men), the estimates are conditional associations within a selected sample rather than causal effects, and the non-significant interactions are inconclusive rather than evidence of gender similarity. The findings suggest that pleasure-oriented and socially visible consumption warrants attention in teacher financial-wellbeing programmes.</p> Sisriyenti, Efni Cerya Copyright (c) 2026 Sisriyenti, Efni Cerya https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://siducat.org/index.php/jpi/article/view/2656 Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:26:23 +0700