Analisis Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Terhadap Pencapaian Prestasi Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Kelas XI SMA N 1 Mejayan

  • Tutik Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Mejayan
Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Problem Contextual Teaching and Learning, Economic Learning

Abstract

 The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in the effect between the learning method PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) and CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) on the achievement of economic learning competence on the subject of tax for high school students in class XI semester 1. This study used a real experimental method (CTL) true experimental research). The study population was all students of class XI of SMA N 1 Mejayan, consisting of 5 classes, with many students in each class of 40 to 45 students. Samples were taken by cluster sampling technique of 2 classes, the selected class is XI Social Sciences 2 class as experimental class I and XI Social Sciences 3 as experimental class II. Data collection techniques using the test method. Testing the requirements analysis of the normality test used the Shapiro Wilk method and the homogeneity test used the Levene method. The data analysis technique used is the t test. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded: There is a difference in the effect between the learning method PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) with the method of learning CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) on the achievement of economic learning achievement on the subject of tax for high school students in class XI semester 1. This is indicated by the value of t arithmetic of -11.215 at a significant level of 0.05 that is equal to 0.041 so that the significant value is smaller than 0.05 (probability 0.041 <0.05). The average change in economic learning achievement on the subject of tax for PBL class is 1.68 and for CTL class is 3.03. Therefore, the CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) method is more influential in improving learning achievement.  

References

Aiken, L.R. 2000. Psychological Testing and Assesment. 10th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Asmawi Zainul. 2001. Alternative Assesment Applied Approach mengajar Di Perguruan Tinggi.Buku 2.09. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti DepDikNas.

Chaedar Alwasilah. 2006. Contextual Theaching and Learning. Bandung: MLC.

Consuelo. G. Sevilla et al.2000. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif . Jakarta: UI Press.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2002. Pendekatan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi tahun 2004 . Jakarta: DepDikNas.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamaah Sopaah. 2000. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No.02. Tahun ke-5. Maret 2000.

Djarwanto.P.S.1990. Pokok-pokok Metode Riset Dan Bimbingan Teknik Penulisan Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Duch. 1995. PBL. http://www.uii.ac.id. (03 Juli 2006)

Finkle & Torp. http://www.cotf.edu/ete/teacherout/html. (05 Juli 2006)

Hamzah. 2004. Makalah Workshop Model-Model Pembelajaran – Problem Based Learning. Sulawesi Selatan: Lembaga Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan. http //www.udel.edu/ PBL.

Hernowo. 2005. Menjadi Guru yang Mau dan Mampu Mengajar dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Konstektual. Bandung: Penerbit MLC.

Kresnohadi Ariyoto, 1977. “Belajar Berdasarkan Masalah”. Majalah Usahawan no. 5 Th XXVI Mei.

Nurhadi. 2004. Kurikulum 2004. Jakarta: Gramedia Widisarana.

Oemar Hamalik. 2003. Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Saifudin Azwar. 1987. Tes Prestasi Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar Edisi II. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar Ofsett.

Sardiman. 1996. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Singgih D. Gunarso. 1996. Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.

Singgih Santoso. 2004. SPSS Versi 10 Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Slamet PH. 2006. MBS, Life skill, KBK, CTL dan Saling Keterkaitannya. www.ui.ac.id. (01 Juni 2006)

Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Toeti Soekamto dan Winataputra. 1996. Teori Belajar dan Metode-metode Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Suhaenah Suparno. 2000. Membangun Kompetensi Belajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Suharsimi Arikunto. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sutrisno Hadi. 2000. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofsett.

Tabrani Rusyan, Atang Kusdinar dan Zainal Arifin. 1989. Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remadja Karya.

Thorndike, R.L and Hagen. 1977. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Waridjan. 1991. Tes Hasil Belajar Gaya Objektif. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

White. H.B & Richin. 1996. Dan Tries Problem Based Learning A Case Study. http // www.udel.edu/ PBL. (04 Juni 2006)

Winarno Surakhmad. 1990. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia Widisarana.

Winkel, W.S. 1986. Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Published
2020-10-16
How to Cite
Tutik, T. (2020). Analisis Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dan Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Terhadap Pencapaian Prestasi Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Kelas XI SMA N 1 Mejayan. GHAITSA : Islamic Education Journal , 1(3). https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v1i3.51
Section
Articles