Kesalehan Sosial dalam mewujudkan Ketenangan lahir dan Bathin Perspektif Filsafat Islam
Abstract
This study examines social piety in realizing inner and outer peace from the perspective of Islamic philosophy. The research aims to analyze the concept of social piety, its relationship with human well-being, and its relevance in addressing the spiritual and social crises of modern society. This study employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing various sources related to Islamic philosophy, social ethics, spirituality, and psychological well-being. The findings reveal that social piety in Islamic philosophy is not limited to individual religious devotion but also includes social responsibility, empathy, justice, solidarity, and concern for humanity. Thinkers such as Al-Ghazali, Ibn Miskawayh, and Al-Farabi emphasize that true happiness and peace can only be achieved through the balance between spiritual values and harmonious social relations. Furthermore, the study finds that modern crises such as individualism, materialism, alienation, and mental health problems are closely related to the decline of social and spiritual values in society. Therefore, social piety serves as a philosophical and ethical solution in creating psychological well-being, social harmony, and holistic human happiness. This study concludes that social piety in Islamic philosophy is highly relevant as a humanistic paradigm for achieving both inner and outer peace in contemporary society.
References
Abrutyn, Seth, and Anna S Mueller. “When Too Much Integration and Regulation Hurts: Reenvisioning Durkheim’s Altruistic Suicide.” Society and Mental Health 6, no. 1 (2016): 56–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869315604346.
Abu-Raiya, Hisham, and Kenneth I Pargament. “Religious Coping among Diverse Religions: Commonalities and Divergences.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 7, no. 1 (2015): 24. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0037652.
Alisa, Nur. “Konsep Negara Dan Masyarakat Ideal Menurut Al-Farabi Dalam Sudut Pandang Ekonomi.” Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah 6, no. 2 (2023): 493–506.
Anwar, Sholihul. “Integrasi Keilmuan Prespektif M. Amin Abdullah Dan Imam Suprayogo.” Jurnal Pedagogy 14, no. 2 (2021): 142–65.
ASSIJI, Youssef EL. “Islam, Secularism, and the Muslim Dilemma: A Thematic Review of Islam and Secularism by Sayed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas.” Ijtihad Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies 1, no. 2 (2025): 347–54.
Azra, Azyumardi. Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi Dan Modernisasi Menuju Milenium Baru. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1999.
Bakar, Osman. Islamic Civilisation and the Modern World: Thematic Essays. ubd, 2015.
Creswell, John. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications., 2003.
Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
Denzin, Norman K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Routledge, 2017.
Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. sage, 2011.
Fakhry, M. A History of Islamic Philosophy. New york: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. A&C Black, 2013.
Guefara, Rahmat Lutfi. “Hubungan Ilmu Tasawuf Dan Ilmu Kalam Dalam Perspektif Abu-Hamid Muhammad (Al-Ghazali).” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Agama Islam 2, no. 3 (2024): 303–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v2i3.354.
Haryanto, Sindung. “Sosiologi Agama Dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern.” Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media 1, no. 1 (2015).
Hefner, Robert W. “Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia.” In Civil Islam. Princeton University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823871.
Juhana, Hendri, Nanat Fatah Natsir, and Erni Haryanti. “Integrasi Ilmu M. Amin Abdullah Dan Kuntowijoyo.” JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (2022): 192–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i1.397.
Keyes, Corey L M. “The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2002, 207–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197.
Koenig, Harold G. “Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications.” International Scholarly Research Notices 2012, no. 1 (2012): 278730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730.
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage publications, 2018.
Miles, Matthew B, A Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis. sage, 2014.
Moleong, L J. “Lexy J Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.” Remaja Rosda Karya, 2004.
Moore, Matthew D. “Durkheim’s Types of Suicide and Social Capital: A Cross‐national Comparison of 53 Countries.” International Social Science Journal 66, no. 219–220 (2016): 151–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12111.
Organization, World Health. World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All. World Health Organization, 2022.
Putnam, Robert D. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Culture and Politics: A Reader, 2000, 223–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_12.
Ramli, Mohammad. “Konsep Pendidikan Akhlak Ibnu Miskawaih: Studi Kitab Tahdzib Al-Akhlak.” Jurnal Sustainable 5, no. 2 (2022): 208–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32923/kjmp.v5i2.2669.
Ryff, Carol D. “Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 4, no. 4 (1995): 99–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395.
———. “Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 83, no. 1 (2013): 10–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263.
Ryff, Carol D, and Corey Lee M Keyes. “The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, no. 4 (1995): 719.
Sugiyono, Dr. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif,” 2022.
Zaluchu, Sonny Eli. “Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Di Dalam Penelitian Agama.” Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat 4, no. 1 (2020): 28–38.
Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan, 2008.
Copyright (c) 2026 Irsal Irsal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with KENDURI: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the KENDURI: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
