Developing an Integrated Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah-Based Social Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Model for Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from HIPMI Indonesia

  • Marliyah Marliyah State Islamic University of North Sumatra
  • Syuhada Fela Yudha State Islamic University of North Sumatra
  • Muhammad Ramadhan State Islamic University of North Sumatra
  • Muhammad Yafiz State Islamic University of North Sumatra
Keywords: Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), HIPMI Indonesia, Social Entrepreneurship Ecosystem

Abstract

Background: Social entrepreneurship is increasingly seen as a strategic engine for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in countries with a majority of Muslims. However, there are few empirical studies that treat Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah as a measurable construct within entrepreneurial ecosystem models, and there is little data on how entrepreneurial associations like the Indonesian Young Entrepreneurs Association (HIPMI) influence this process.

Method: This study used a quantitative, explanatory approach to survey 255 HIPMI members in North Sumatra, Indonesia, using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the data.

Results: The measurement model met all validity and reliability criteria (AVE = 0.777–0.902; Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability above 0.90), while the structural model demonstrated strong predictive relevance (Q² = 0.679–0.738), substantial explanatory power (R² = 0.764–0.886), and a good overall fit (SRMR = 0.038). Social Entrepreneurship was one of the twelve hypotheses that received support.Features that have the most beneficial impact on Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah (β = 0.600). External support had no discernible direct impact on Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah, while the role of HIPMI had no discernible direct impact on SDG Contribution. However, both relationships gained significance after being mediated by the Social Entrepreneurship Ecosystem.

Conclusion: These results corroborate the Islamic Social Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Model (ISEEM), demonstrating that when entrepreneurial capacity, ecosystem development, institutional support, and the internalization of Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah work together, sustainable development is strengthened.

References

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Chapra, M. U. (2016). The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of Maqasid Al-Shari'ah. Herndon, VA: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dees, J. G. (1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2021). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Harahap, I., Nawawi, Z. M., & Sugiarto, E. (2022). Industri kreatif UMKM (Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah) di Kota Medan dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(2), 1991-1997. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i2.5796

Harahap, M. I., Nasution, M. L. I., & Nasution, J. (2024). The preferences of the Indonesian Young Entrepreneurs Association (HIPMI) at the State Islamic University of North Sumatera towards entrepreneurial interest. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan, 11(2), 486-500. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v11i2.2467

Haugh, H. (2020). New directions in social entrepreneurship research. In G. T. Lumpkin & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Himpunan Pengusaha Muda Indonesia (HIPMI). (2026). Company Profile and Organizational Programs. Jakarta: HIPMI National Board.

Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.

Kamla, R., & Rammal, H. G. (2019). Zakat reporting: a comparative analysis of Islamic banks in Australasia and the Gulf region. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(4), 481-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2017-0116

Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

Mohammed, T. A. S. (2024). A scientometric study of Maqasid al-shariah research: trending issues, hotspot research, and co-citation analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, 1439407. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1439407

Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

Siregar, D., Yuslem, N., & Nawawi, Z. M. (2023). Strategy for strengthening business incubators to form an entrepreneurial spirit in Islamic university. Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 7(1), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.29313/amwaluna.v7i1.12062

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

Turyakira, P., Sendawula, K., Nanyanzi, M., Nantale, H., & Tamale, J. N. (2025). Social entrepreneurship: empirical evidence on its contribution to the realization of the sustainable development goals in Uganda. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 17(1), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-02-2023-0011

United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/70/1.

Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022). Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 729-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948

Published
2026-09-29
How to Cite
Marliyah, M., Fela Yudha, S., Ramadhan, M., & Yafiz, M. (2026). Developing an Integrated Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah-Based Social Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Model for Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from HIPMI Indonesia. Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 7(3), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.62159/sembj.v7i3.2697