The Role of Adaptive Innovation in Sustainable Competitiveness: Evidence from Private Higher Education Institutions' Response to Digital Disruption on Student Retention and Institutional Reputation
Abstract
Background: Private higher education institutions face increasing pressure from digital disruption, competition, and changing stakeholder expectations. However, digital transformation does not automatically lead to innovation outcomes. This study examines the roles of digital disruption, dynamic capabilities, and organizational ambidexterity in developing adaptive innovation and its impact on student retention, institutional reputation, and sustainable competitive advantage.
Research Gap: Previous studies have largely focused on technology adoption, digital learning platforms, and technological readiness, providing limited explanation of how digital disruption is transformed into adaptive innovation and institutional outcomes. The organizational mechanisms underlying adaptive innovation remain insufficiently integrated, with dynamic capabilities and organizational ambidexterity often examined separately rather than as interconnected capability mechanisms.
Novelty: This study develops an integrated framework linking digital disruption, dynamic capabilities, and organizational ambidexterity with adaptive innovation, and examines how adaptive innovation contributes to student retention, institutional reputation, and sustainable competitive advantage in private higher education institutions, extending Dynamic Capabilities Theory into the higher education context.
Method: A quantitative explanatory design using a cross-sectional survey was employed. Data were collected from 316 academic and managerial respondents across 77 private higher education institutions in the LLDIKTI Region II area of Indonesia. The proposed model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with SmartPLS 4.0, including measurement model assessment, structural model evaluation, effect size analysis, and predictive assessment.
Results: The findings show that dynamic capabilities strongly influence adaptive innovation (β=0.802, p<0.001), followed by organizational ambidexterity (β=0.241, p<0.001). Adaptive innovation positively affects student retention (β=0.741, p<0.001) and institutional reputation (β=0.916, p<0.001), while institutional reputation enhances sustainable competitive advantage (β=0.744, p<0.001). Digital disruption does not significantly influence adaptive innovation (β=-0.036, p=0.054), indicating that technology pressure alone is insufficient to generate innovation without organizational capabilities. The model explains 93.3% of the variance in adaptive innovation.
Conclusion: Adaptive innovation in private higher education institutions is primarily capability-driven rather than technology-driven. The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory by demonstrating that organizational capabilities are essential for transforming digital challenges into innovation outcomes and sustainable competitiveness.
References
Al Hassani, H., & Wilkins, S. (2022). Student retention in higher education: The role of teaching quality, institutional identification, and institutional reputation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 293-309.
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research, 136, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.01
Aula, P., & Tienari, J. (2011). Becoming “world-class”? Reputation-building in a university merger. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422041111103893
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of digital transformation strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121763
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
Hughes, M. (2018). Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: Burning research questions for marketing scholars. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(1-2), 178-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175
Kaniak, A. D., Teixeira, E. K., & Schaefer, R. (2023). Dynamic capabilities in university technology transfer offices: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 1015-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09945-1
Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Kessler, A., & Schweiger, C. (2019). Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: Measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(5), 1149-1172. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty054
Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
Lynch, R., & Baines, P. (2004). Strategy development in UK higher education: Towards resource-based competitive advantages. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080042000218249
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Sahni, J., Smith, K., & Thompson, R. (2024). Digital transformation in higher education: A systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2178521
Stolze, A., & Sailer, K. (2022). Advancing dynamic capabilities of universities: How third mission engagement can strengthen knowledge transfer. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 823-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817889
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Copyright (c) 2026 Yenny Marthalena, M. Yusuf S. Barusman, Andala R.P. Barusman, Defrizal Defrizal, Sunarmi Sunarmi, Yuni Astini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The authors warrant that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Manajemen Syariah (SEMB-J), Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://siducat.org/index.php/sembj/.
