Estimating Classroom Activeness in Science Learning: Proportions, Benchmarks, and Implications in an Indonesian Junior High

  • Elga Nadia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
  • Vebbri Putri Yani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
  • Vegita Elgrice Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
Keywords: Benchmarking, Classroom engagement, Junior high school, Science education, Student activeness

Abstract

This study addresses the need for classroom‐level evidence on student activeness in junior-high science by estimating the proportion of learners across engagement categories during routine lessons. Using a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design, data were collected in a single administration from an intact eighth-grade class at SMPN 14 Bengkulu City (N = 30; 15 male, 15 female; response rate 100%). A 15-item Likert-type questionnaire operationalized five indicators of classroom activeness (participation in discussions, articulating opinions, initiating questions, problem solving, and involvement in practical work). Responses were summarized as frequencies and percentages across five categories (Inactive, Less active, Moderately active, Active, Very active). Results showed no students in the Inactive or Less active categories (0% each), with 10% Moderately active, 30% Active, and 60% Very active, indicating a strongly favorable engagement profile in day-to-day science instruction. These findings suggest that classroom routines in the observed setting support frequent student voice, questioning, and hands-on involvement, and they provide a category-based benchmark that makes heterogeneity visible for instructional decision-making. The principal contribution is a practical baseline reported as proportions rather than only mean scores that schools can use to set targets, tailor supports for moderately active students, and monitor shifts over time. Implications include guiding teacher professional development toward participation-eliciting routines, informing resource allocation for practical activities, and establishing a measurement approach that can be scaled and triangulated (e.g., with classroom observations) to drive continuous improvement in lower-secondary science learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, N. J., Yakob, N., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Winarno, N., & Akmal, W. H. (2021). The effect of interactive computer animation and simulation on students' achievement and motivation in learning electrochemistry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.26013

Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2020). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1679202

An, F., Yu, J., & Xi, L. (2022). Relationship between perceived teacher support and learning engagement among adolescents: Mediation role of technology acceptance and learning motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992464

Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002

Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 703-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x

Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J., & Mainhard, T. (2021). Perceived classroom disruption undermines the positive educational effects of perceived need-supportive teaching in science. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101498

Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2021). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 754-779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004

Cromley, J. G., Du, Y., & Dane, A. P. (2020). Drawing-to-learn: Does meta-analysis show differences between technology-based drawing and paper-and-pencil drawing? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09807-6

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Haw, J. Y., & King, R. B. (2022). Need-supportive teaching is associated with reading achievement via intrinsic motivation across eight cultures. Learning and Individual Differences, 97, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102161

Hidi, S. E., & Renninger, K. A. (2019). Interest development and its relation to curiosity: Needed neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 833-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09491-3

Hujjatusnaini, N., Corebima, A. D., Prawiro, S. R., & Gofur, A. (2022). The effect of blended project-based learning integrated with 21st-century skills on pre-service biology teachers' higher-order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.27148

Ilma, S., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students' metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083

Kaur, T., McLoughlin, E., & Grimes, P. (2022). Mathematics and science across the transition from primary to secondary school: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00328-0

Ma, Y., & Wei, C. (2022). The relationship between perceived classroom climate and academic performance among English-major teacher education students in Guangxi, China: The mediating role of student engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939661

Mallari, M. D., & Tayag, J. R. (2022). Situational interest and engagement of public junior high school science students in modular distance learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 581-598. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15332a

Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of students' critical thinking skill of middle school through STEM education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413-454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing: Vol. I. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii-acd78851-en.htm

Pasco, D., & Roure, C. (2022). Situational interest impacts college students' physical activity in a design-based bike exergame. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.003

Patall, E. A., Hooper, S., Vasquez, A. C., Pituch, K. A., & Steingut, R. R. (2018). Science class is too hard: Perceived difficulty, disengagement, and the role of teacher autonomy support from a daily diary perspective. Learning and Instruction, 58, 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.004

Räisänen, M., Pyörälä, E., & Tuononen, T. (2022). What factors of the teaching and learning environment support the learning of generic skills? First-year students' perceptions in medicine, dentistry, and psychology. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.886052

Rapi, N. K., Suastra, I. W., Widiarini, P., & Widiana, I. W. (2022). The influence of flipped classroom-based project assessment on concept understanding and critical thinking skills in physics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.38275

Roure, C., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., Méard, J., & Pasco, D. (2019). Universality and uniqueness of students' situational interest in physical education: A comparative study. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.446

Setiati, N., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Analysis of science learning achievement based on parents' socio-economic status and students' interest in science learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 296-301. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1249

Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9

Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-STEM project-based learning: Its impact on critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754

Suryawati, E., Suzanti, F., Zulfarina, Z., Putriana, A. R., & Febrianti, L. (2020). The implementation of local environmental problem-based learning student worksheets to strengthen environmental literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.22892

Susnjak, T., Ramaswami, G. S., & Mathrani, A. (2022). Learning analytics dashboard: A tool for providing actionable insights to learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00313-7

Tao, Y., Meng, Y., Gao, Z., & Yang, X. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

Utami, A. M., & Amaliyah, N. (2022). Effect of blended learning model assisted video animation to the motivation and learning outcomes of science. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1416-1424. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1675

van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003

Wassalwa, M., Evendi, E., Huda, I., Yusrizal, Y., Halim, A., & Saminan, S. (2022). Sikap peserta didik terhadap sains di sekolah menengah pertama dan madrasah tsanawiyah negeri Kabupaten Aceh Jaya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 709-717. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1359

Yustina, Y., Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers' creative thinking skills through online learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706

Published
2023-05-19
How to Cite
Nadia, E., Putri Yani, V., & Elgrice, V. (2023). Estimating Classroom Activeness in Science Learning: Proportions, Benchmarks, and Implications in an Indonesian Junior High. ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal, 4(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v4i3.96
Section
Articles