Manuscripts submitted to KENDURI will be reviewed and selected by the Editorial Team based on suitability for the research field, predetermined templates, and Finansialku writing guidelines. Manuscripts that meet the requirements will be returned to the author for revision. The revised manuscript will be sent to the reviewer.

Presentation
Does the paper make a cohesive argument? Are ideas presented clearly?

Writing
Does the title characterize the manuscript? Is the writing concise and easy to follow?

Long
Which parts of the manuscript should be expanded? Eliminated? Compacted? Summarized? Combined?

Title
Is the title concise, eliminating implicit terms and, if possible, a statement of the main results or conclusions presented in the manuscript? Abbreviations should be avoided in titles.

Abstract
Does the abstract consist of 1) research objectives; 2) method; 3) results or findings; and 4) conclusion?

Introduction
Describe clearly and individually:

Research background;
Current and relevant research to justify the novelty of the manuscript;
Gap analysis, novelty statement;
Hypothesis or problem statement (optional);
Approach to solving problems;
The method is written clearly, so that other researchers can replicate the experiment or research with the same results;
Not only explaining the definition of terms, but also explaining how to conduct research;
Describe the location, participants, research instruments, and data analysis;
Purpose of the research.

Results and Discussion

The data presented has been processed (not raw data) into tables or images and provided with supporting information so that it is easy to understand.
The research results are related to the initial questions or objectives described in the Introduction section.
The author explains that the research results are in accordance with what has been reported by other researchers or whether there are differences.
The author provides a scientific interpretation for each result or finding presented.
The author explains the implications of the research.
The author explains the limitations of the research or weaknesses of the research method or position.
The author explains the need/further areas for research or expansion of the idea.

Conclusion
Consist of:

Answering research objectives;
Implications or recommendations (optional);
Written in a paragraph, not in bullet points/numbering.

The outcome of the review will be one of the following decisions

Accepting Submissions
Revision Required
Resend for Review
Resend Elsewhere
Reject Submission
View Comments