Organizational Culture and HR Management in Public Sector
Social Exchange Mechanisms in the Merit System for Senior Official Selection in Riau Provincial Government
Abstract
Background: Organizational culture and HR management in public bureaucracy face a structural paradox when formal merit systems operate alongside deeply embedded socio-cultural norms. Riau Province's Civil Service Merit Index rose from 227.5 (2019) to 325.5 (2024), yet the "Promotion & Mutation" sub-componentthe direct measure of appointment integrityscored only 37.5% in the critical 2020 mass selection year. Simultaneously, 54.2% of appointments went to candidates ranked 2nd or 3rd rather than to the highest-scorer, signaling systematic non-merit intervention.
Method: Qualitative case study design (Yin, 2022) examining the 2020 open selection of 24 Senior Civil Service (JPT Pratama) positions in Riau Provincial Government. Data from in-depth interviews (n=17 key informants), participant observation (8 months), and document analysis were analyzed through a thematic-dialectical procedure framed within social exchange theory (Homans, 1961; Blau, 1964; Emerson, 1976; Molm, 2003), Ekeh's Two Publics (1974), and Riau Malay organizational culture (Effendy, 2013).
Results: Three simultaneous exchange layers structure the HR appointment process: (1) an administrative layer where competency scores are exchanged for procedural legitimacy; (2) a substantive back-stage layer in the governor's discretionary space where political loyalty displaces merit as the decisive currency; and (3) a cultural legitimation layer where Malay values of Berbalas Budi (reciprocal kindness), Amanah (trust), and Marwah (dignity/honor) are strategically renarrated as moral cover (Selubung Moral) to normalize patronage.
Conclusion: The study proposes a Culturally Contextualized Social Exchange Model (CCSEM)a Hybrid Bureaucracy Frameworkwherein formal merit functions as institutional legitimacy scaffolding, patronage serves as the substantive appointment driver, and local culture acts as the moral adhesive sustaining this hybrid equilibrium. This contributes novel theoretical ground to organizational sociology and Islamic corporate governance, calling for reforms that reclaim authentic Islamic-Malay values against their appropriated, patronage-justifying distortions.
References
Amir, M., & Hertanto, H. (2023). Netralitas ASN dalam pusaran pilkada: Koersi dan keberpihakan struktural. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(2), 112–130.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. (1999). Leadership: An Islamic perspective. Amana Publications.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bukti, A. (2023). Anomali seleksi JPT Pratama: Studi kasus Pemerintah Kota Makassar. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 44–61.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Damayanti, R., Fauzi, A., & Syahrani, H. (2024). Right man on the right place: Ilusi administratif dan realitas patronase di birokrasi daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 12(1), 28–46.
Darmansyah, D., Nasution, F., & Rasyid, M. (2020). Sistem karier tertutup dan politisasi ASN di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 26(2), 175–194.
Dwiputrianti, S. (2018). From spoils to merit: Challenges in Indonesia's civil service reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 987–999.
Effendy, T. (2013). Tunjuk ajar Melayu. Tenas Effendy Foundation.
Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Harvard University Press.
Ekeh, P. P. (1975). Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: A theoretical statement. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17(1), 91–112.
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.
Halim, H. (2022). Rekonstruksi kelembagaan KASN dalam penguatan sistem merit ASN. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(1), 1–22.
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.
Hendrik, B., Asmara, S., & Putra, D. (2023). Penyimpangan relasi sosial dalam pilkada dan instrumentalisasi budaya gotong royong. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 8(1), 55–74.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Jubba, H., Qodir, Z., Pabbajah, M., & Jubba, I. (2021). Negotiating Malay-Islamic identity politics in Riau. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 15(2), 376–400.
Junaidi, J. (2014). Epistemologi kepemimpinan Melayu dalam teks sastra lokal: Kajian semiotika dan hermeneutika. Jurnal Kebudayaan Melayu, 6(2), 33–57.
Kopecký, P., & Scherlis, G. (2008). Party patronage in contemporary Europe. European Review, 16(3), 355–371.
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352.
Malik, N., & Prasojo, E. (2023). Institutional isomorphism and merit system implementation: Evidence from Indonesia's open selection. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 23–48.
Misra, T., Karmilasari, V., & Alamsyah, R. (2021). Klientelisme elektoral dan patronase birokrasi: Studi pilkada Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 25(1), 1–18.
Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1–17.
Nugroho, B., Pratama, A., & Sulaksono, H. (2025). Fear of demotion as a political compliance tool in Indonesian local bureaucracy. Journal of Comparative Public Administration, 10(1), 45–66.
Peters, B. G., & Bianchi, C. (2020). Dynamic governance performance: Puzzles and prospects. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(1), 29–45.
Polese, A. (2023). The art of bypassing the state: Informality and everyday bureaucracy. Springer.
Prasojo, E. (2014). Reformasi birokrasi Indonesia: Perkembangan dan permasalahan. USAID-DRSP.
Pujileksono, S. (2022). Jual beli jabatan dan patronase dalam perspektif teori pertukaran sosial dan pilihan rasional. Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(2), 88–110.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in developing countries: The theory of prismatic society. Houghton Mifflin.
Ritzer, G. (2015). Sosiologi ilmu pengetahuan berparadigma ganda (10th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Rosyan, A., & Prasojo, E. (2024). "Ordal" dan "Orang Kita": Patronase informal dalam birokrasi daerah Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 15(1), 1–20.
Savira, F., & Tasrin, K. (2018). Kearifan lokal sebagai instrumen inovasi pelayanan publik. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 14(2), 101–120.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.
Syamsuadi, A. (2018). Tata kelola dan kepemimpinan dalam perspektif Melayu Riau. Universitas Riau Press.
Thoha, M. (2016). Birokrasi dan politik di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Toral, G. (2024). The benefits of patronage: How the political appointment of bureaucrats can enhance their accountability and effectiveness. American Political Science Review, 118(1), 1–17.
Turner, M., Hulme, D., & McCourt, W. (2022). Governance, management and development: Making the state work (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Warburton, E. (2020). Oligarchy and the "new" economic nationalism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(4), 633–653.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (Trans. A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons). Free Press.
Wijaya, A., Pratama, H., & Kurnia, T. (2019). Kekerabatan, identitas komunal, dan seleksi jabatan: Studi di Pemerintah Kota Palembang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 54–73.
Yin, R. K. (2022). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy. Thames and Hudson.
Zuhro, R. S. (2010). Birokrasi yang tersandera: Politisasi ASN pasca pilkada. LIPI Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ikhwan Ridwan, Oman Sukmana, Rachmad Kristiono Dwi Susilo, Junaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The authors warrant that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Manajemen Syariah (SEMB-J), Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://siducat.org/index.php/sembj/.
