Analysis Of The Quality Of Items for VIII Class IPA Teachers MTs.N I Kota Bengkulu Study Year 2019/2020

  • Raden Gamal Tamrin Kusumah Mahasiswa Program Studi Doktor Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Bengkulu
  • Hadiwinarto Universitas Bengkulu
Keywords: Question Quality, Question Items, Natural Science Lessons

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, differentiation power, and item distractors made by science subject teachers of class VIII MTs.N 1 Bengkulu, Academic Year 2019/2020. Samples were taken by saturated sampling technique. The instrument in this study was a daily test sheet made by a science subject teacher for grade VIII, which amounted to 20 multiple choice questions. Analysis of the construct validity of multiple choice questions in terms of material, construction and language is appropriate, there are several questions that still need to be improved in terms of construction. Analysis of the validity of the UH 1 items showed that 40% of the questions were valid; reliability of 0.76 means that it has high consistency; the difficulty level of the questions was 40% difficult, 55% moderate and 5% easy questions; difference power 45% bad, 35% sufficient and 20% good; 80% of cheaters are functional. At UH 2 60% of the questions are valid; reliability of 0.78 means it has high consistency; 35% for difficult questions and 65% for medium questions; difference power 30% bad, 45% sufficient and 25% good; 75% of cheaters are functioning.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Basic Basic Educational Evaluation. (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Earth Literacy.

Arjuniwati, A. 2019. Increasing Motivation and Learning Outcomes Through the Application of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Learning Model to the Opportunity Material for Class XII Mathematics Subjects. Tambusai Education Journal. Volume 3, No. 1, p. 1–13.

Astalini, & Kurniawan, DA 2019. Instrument Development for Middle School Students' Attitudes Toward Natural Science Subjects. Journal of Science Education (JPS). Volume 7, No. 1, p. 1–7.

Borg, W.R dan Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational Research An Introduction (4th Ed). White Plains : Logman Inc.

Dewantari, A. 2015. Laporan Pengolahan Hasil Angket SNP SMAN 1 Surakarta dan SMAN 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Laporan Tidak Dipublikasikan. Pascasarjana FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Dewi, NDL, & Prasetyo, ZK 2016. Development of Science Assessment Instruments to Map Critical Thinking and Practical Skills of Middle School Students. Journal of Science Education Innovation. Volume 2, No. 2, p. 213–222.

Dewi, NR, & Akhlis, I. 2016. The Development of Multicultural Education-Based Natural Science Learning Tools Using Games to Develop Student Character. Unnes Science Education Journal. Volume 5, No. 1, p. 1098–1108.

Djaali & Muljono, Pudji. 2008. Measurement in the field of education. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Halaydina, T.M dan Downing, S.M. 1989. A Taxonomy of Multiple Choice Item Writing Rules. Applied Measurements In Education, 2(1), 37-50.

Hamid, MA 2016. The Development of ICT-Based Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Instruments in Basic Electrical Electronics Learning. Scientific Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. Volume 1, No. 1, p. 37–46.

Hardiani, IN 2017. Development of Social Attitudes Assessment of Social Studies Learning Instruments for Class IV SD. Journal of Educational Partners. Volume 1, No. 6, p. 2550– 0481.

Harlen, W. 1992. The Teaching of Science: Studies in Primary Education. London: David Fulton Publishers.

Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah. 2016. The Validity and Reliability of the Active, Creative and Fun Learning Knowledge Instrument (PAKEM) Using the Rasch Model. Scientific Journal. Volume 16, No. 2, p. 169–179.

Joesmani. 1988. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture, Directorate General of Higher Education Project for the Development of Educational Personnel Education Institutions.

Keterampilan Proses Sains. Makalah Tidak Dipublikasikan. Program Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Konsentrasi Pendidikan Biologi-SL. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Nurkancana, Wayan & Sunartana, PPN 1986. Educational Evaluation. (4th printing). Surabaya: National Business.

Permendiknas No. 20 Tahun 2007. Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas. Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006. Standar Isi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Permendiknas No. 23 Tahun 2006. Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Purnomo, P., & Palupi, MS 2016. The Development of Mathematics Learning Outcomes Tests for Solving Problems Related to Time, Distance and Speed for Class V Students. Research Journal (PGSD Special Edition). Volume 20, No. 2, p. 151–157.

Purwanto, N. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purwanto, Ngalim. 2011. Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Ramirez, R.P.B. dan Ganaden, M.S. 2008. Creative Activities and Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Quarterly, Vol 66 (1), 22-23.

Sudijono, Anas. 2007. Introduction to Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, Nana. 2004. Assessment of Results and Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Youth Rosdakarya,

Sugiyono. 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R & D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharman. 2018. Tests as a Measure of Academic Achievement. Scientific Journal of Islamic Religious Education. Volume 10, No. 1, p. 93–115.

Sujana, IWC 2019. Functions and Objectives of Indonesian Education. ADI WIDYA: Journal of Basic Education. Volume 4, No. 1, p. 29–39.

Suryabrata, Sumadi, 1987. Development of Learning Outcomes Tests. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Treagust, D.F. 2006. Development and Use of Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Students Misconception In Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 2 pp 159-169.

Trimawati, K., Kirana, T., & Raharjo, R. 2020. Development of Integrated Science Assessment Instruments in Project Based Learning (PJBL) Model to Improve Middle School Students' Critical and Creative Thinking Ability. QUANTUM: Journal of Science Education Innovation. Volume 11, No. 1, p. 36–52.

Tuysuz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students Understanding In Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay Academic Journals Vol 4 (6) pp. 626-631, June 2009. ISSN 1992-2248.

Uno, HB 2008. Motivation & Measurement Theory. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Wahidmuri, et al. 2010. Evaluasi Pembelajaran kompetensi dan praktik. Yogyakarta: Nuha Litara

Yuliati, L. 2008. Model-Model Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang.

Yusuf, M. 2015. Assessment and Evaluation of Education: Pillars of Information Providers and Activities to Control Quality of Education. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Published
2021-01-01
How to Cite
Kusumah, R. G. T., & Hadiwinarto, H. (2021). Analysis Of The Quality Of Items for VIII Class IPA Teachers MTs.N I Kota Bengkulu Study Year 2019/2020 . ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2(1), 27-37. Retrieved from https://siducat.org/index.php/isej/article/view/158