Assessment Instruments of Learning Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Class V Elementary School Students

  • Ahmad Walid Mahasiswa Program Studi Doktor Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Bengkulu
  • Hadiwinarto Universitas Bengkulu
Keywords: Instruments, Motivation, Result, Study, Natural Science.

Abstract

This research aims to evolve an instrument of learning motivation assessment and natural science learning outcomes. The development model used in this research was 4D, consists of define, design, develop, and disseminate. This study was only carried out until the develop stage. The subject of this research was a science learning evaluation instrument consisting of a grid, questionnaire sheet and a test of natural science learning outcome. Data collected using questionnaire and test methods. The data would be analyzed for the validity and reliability of each instrument. The average value 0.92 and 1 obtained from the results of the learning motivation assessment and learning outcome instrument validity analysis, which means that both of these assessment instruments have a very high validity. While the results of the learning motivation assessment instruments reliability analysis 0.86 and natural science learning outcome 0.87, which means that both of these instruments have a high level of reliability. From these results, it could be explained that the development of learning motivation assessment and natural science learning outcome instrument were feasible to be developed and used to make assessment of student.

References

Abdullah, R. 2015. The Urgency of Class-Based Assessment of Social Studies Subjects in Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Latanida Journal. Volume 3, No. 2.

Adesoji, F. A. dan Omilani, N.A. 2012. A Comparison of Secondary Schools Students Levels of Conception of Qualitative And Quantitatif Inorganic Analysis. American Journal of Scientific And Industrial Research. ISSN: 2153-649X.

Agung, AAG 2011. Research Procedure A Practice Approach. Singaraja: Ganesha University of Education.

Agustini, KSA, Gading, IK, & Tristayani, LA 2016. The Effect of Experimental Learning Methods on Science Process Skills in Group B Semester II TK Kartika VII-3. e-Journal of Early Childhood Education Ganesha University of Education. Volume 4, No. 2, p. 1–10.

Agusyana, Y. 2011. Olah Data Skripsi dan Penelitian SPSS 18. Jakarta: Gramedia Aydin, A. 2013. Representation of Science Process Skills In The Chemistry Curricula for Grades 10, 11, and 12/ Turkey. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2013, 1(5) : 51-63.

Aji, BS, & Winarno, ME 2016. Development of Knowledge Assessment Instruments for Physical Education and Health Subjects (PJOK) Class VIII Odd Semester. Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development. Volume 1, No. 7, p. 1449–1463.

Akinbobola, A. O. dan Afolabi, F. 2010. Analysis of Science Process Skills in West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Physics Practical Examinations in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 5 (4): 234-240. ISSN 1818-6785

Andriani, R., & Rasto, R. 2019. Learning Motivation as a Determinant of Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Office Management Education. Volume 4, No. 1, p. 80–86.

Ango, M.L. 2002. Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context. International Journal of Educology 1 (16) : 11-30.

Arikunto, S. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara. Ariyati, E. 2009. Keterampilan Proses Sains. Makalah Tidak Dipublikasikan. Program Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Konsentrasi Pendidikan Biologi-SL. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Arjuniwati, A. 2019. Increasing Motivation and Learning Outcomes Through the Application of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Learning Model to the Opportunity Material for Class XII Mathematics Subjects. Tambusai Education Journal. Volume 3, No. 1, p. 1–13.

Astalini, & Kurniawan, DA 2019. Instrument Development for Middle School Students' Attitudes Toward Natural Science Subjects. Journal of Science Education (JPS). Volume 7, No. 1, p. 1–7.

Borg, W.R dan Gall, M.D. 1983. Educational Research An Introduction (4th Ed). White Plains : Logman Inc.

Borg, W.R., Gall, M.D., dan Gall, J.P. 2007. Educational Research An Introduction (8th Ed). White Plains : Logman Inc.

Budiyono. 2009. Statistika Dasar untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press. Chabalengula, V.M., Mumba, F. dan Mbewe, S. 2012. How Pre-Service Teachers Understand and Perform Science Process Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,

Candiasa, IM 2011. Testing Research Instruments Accompanied by ITEMAN and BIGSTEPS Applications. Singaraja: Ganesha University of Education.

Cullinane, A. dan Liston, M. 2011. Two Tier Multiple Choice Question : An Alternative Method of Formative Assessment for First Year Undergraduate biology Students. Limerick : National Center for Excellence In Mathematics and Education Sciences Teaching and Learning.

Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Penulisan BcuotmirmSoitatlo. Juaskearrta : Depdiknas.

Dewantari, A. 2015. Laporan Pengolahan Hasil Angket SNP SMAN 1 Surakarta dan SMAN 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Laporan Tidak Dipublikasikan. Pascasarjana FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Dewi, NDL, & Prasetyo, ZK 2016. Development of Science Assessment Instruments to Map Critical Thinking and Practical Skills of Middle School Students. Journal of Science Education Innovation. Volume 2, No. 2, p. 213–222.

Dewi, NR, & Akhlis, I. 2016. The Development of Multicultural Education-Based Natural Science Learning Tools Using Games to Develop Student Character. Unnes Science Education Journal. Volume 5, No. 1, p. 1098–1108.

Halaydina, T.M dan Downing, S.M. 1989. A Taxonomy of Multiple Choice Item Writing Rules. Applied Measurements In Education, 2(1), 37-50.

Hamid, MA 2016. The Development of ICT-Based Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Instruments in Basic Electrical Electronics Learning. Scientific Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. Volume 1, No. 1, p. 37–46.

Hardiani, IN 2017. Development of Social Attitudes Assessment of Social Studies Learning Instruments for Class IV SD. Journal of Educational Partners. Volume 1, No. 6, p. 2550– 0481.

Harlen, W. 1992. The Teaching of Science: Studies in Primary Education. London: David Fulton Publishers.

Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah. 2016. The Validity and Reliability of the Active, Creative and Fun Learning Knowledge Instrument (PAKEM) Using the Rasch Model. Scientific Journal. Volume 16, No. 2, p. 169–179.

Huntaruk, P., & Simbolon, R. 2018. Improving Student Learning Outcomes with Teaching Aids in Science Subjects for Class IV SDN Number 14 Simbolon Purba. SEJ (School Education Journal). Volume 8, No. 2, p. 121–129.

Kartimi. 2012. Pengembangan Alat Ukur Berpikir Kritis pada Konsep Termokimia untuk Siswa SMA Peringkat Atas dan Menengah. Jurnal JPII 1 (1) (2012) 21-26.

Kilic, D. dan Saglam, N. 2009. Development of Two Tier Diagnostic Test to Determine Students Understanding of Concepts In Genetics. Egitim Arasmalari-Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 36, 227-244.

Koyan, IW 2011. Assessment in Education. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.

Kutluay, Y. 2005. Diagnosis of Eleventh Grade Student Misconceptions About Geometric Optic By A Three-Tier Test. Thesis. The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University.

Kwen, B.H. dan Cheng, A.K. 2005. Using Two Tier Reflective Multiple Choice Questions to Cater to Creative Thinking. AARE 2005 International Education Research Conference.

Marwah, SS, Syafe'i, M., & Sumarna, E. 2018. The Relevance of the Concept of Education According to Ki Hadjar Dewantara with Islamic Education. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education. Volume 5, No. 1, p. 14–26.

Maulida, EFJ, & Mukminan. 2016. Implementation of Media Assisted Teams Games Tournaments to Improve Learning Outcomes and Attitudes Toward Social Studies Learning. Social Harmony: Journal of Social Studies Education. Volume 3, No. 1, p. 27–38.

Muttaqin, MZ, & Kusaeri, K. 2017. Development of written test assessment instruments in the form of descriptions for problem-based learning of pies on the subject of Fiqh. Tatsqif Journal. Volume 15, No. 1, p. 1–23.

Nofiana, M. 2013. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Norazaini. 2017. Improving Science Learning Outcomes Using Natural Environment Media in Class III Students. Journal of Primary School Teacher Education. Volume 7, No. 6, p. 716–722.

Permendiknas No. 20 Tahun 2007. Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas. Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006. Standar Isi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Permendiknas No. 23 Tahun 2006. Standar Kompetensi Lulusan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Purnomo, P., & Palupi, MS 2016. The Development of Mathematics Learning Outcomes Tests for Solving Problems Related to Time, Distance and Speed for Class V Students. Research Journal (PGSD Special Edition). Volume 20, No. 2, p. 151–157.

Purwanto, N. 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ramirez, R.P.B. dan Ganaden, M.S. 2008. Creative Activities and Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Quarterly, Vol 66 (1), 22-23.

Rusfidra. 2006. Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar IPA Di Kelas Melalui Pedagogi. Tersedia di: http://rayapkabel.wordpress.com/ diakses pada 25 April 2014.

Rustaman, N.Y., dkk. 2012. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Common Textbook JICA IMSTEP. Bandung: FPMTP A UPI.

Sagala, S. 2011. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran untuk Membantu Memecahkan Masalah Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sampson, V. 2006. Two-Tier Assessment. Teacher Toolkit. Arizona : College of Education At Arizona State University In Tempe.

Science & Technology Education, 2012, 8(3), 167-176. Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.

Stiggins, R.J. 1994. Student Centered Classrom Assesment. USA: Macmillanr College Publishing Company.

Subali, B. 2009. Pengembangan Tes Pengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen Biologi SMA. Makalah disajikan pada Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, Lingkungan dan Pembelajarannya. Jurdik Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 4 Juli 2009.

Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R & D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharman. 2018. Tests as a Measure of Academic Achievement. Scientific Journal of Islamic Religious Education. Volume 10, No. 1, p. 93–115.

Sujana, IWC 2019. Functions and Objectives of Indonesian Education. ADI WIDYA: Journal of Basic Education. Volume 4, No. 1, p. 29–39.

Sukiman. 2012. Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta : Insan Madani. Suparlan. 2006. Guru Sebagai Profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat Publishing.

Supranata, S. 2004. Panduan Penulisan Tes Tertulis Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Susilo, H. 2013. Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Materi Sistem Pencernaan Kelas XI SMA N 1 Pemalang. Skripsi. Tersedia di lib.unnes.ac.id/18954/1/4401408098.pdf diakses pada 2 Februari 2015.

Treagust, D.F. 2006. Development and Use of Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Students Misconception In Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 2 pp 159-169.

Trimawati, K., Kirana, T., & Raharjo, R. 2020. Development of Integrated Science Assessment Instruments in Project Based Learning (PJBL) Model to Improve Middle School Students' Critical and Creative Thinking Ability. QUANTUM: Journal of Science Education Innovation. Volume 11, No. 1, p. 36–52.

Tuysuz, C. 2009. Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students Understanding In Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay Academic Journals Vol 4 (6) pp. 626-631, June 2009. ISSN 1992-2248.

Uno, HB 2008. Motivation & Measurement Theory. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Vichitvejpaisal, P., et al. 2011. Developing a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Arterial Blood Gates Learning by Students with Different Background Knowledge In Anesthesiology. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education Vol 5 No 2, 2011.

Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Construction of the assessment concept to measure students' high order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237-251.

Wartono. 2003. Strategi Belajar MengacjaormFmiistiktao.uMsearlang: JICA.

Widodo, W. 2013. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Sains dan Keterkaitannya dengan Ide-Ide Penelitian Pendidikan Sains Menuju Indonesia Maju. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains UNS.

Yuliati, L. 2008. Model-Model Pembelajaran Fisika. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang.

Yusuf, M. 2015. Assessment and Evaluation of Education: Pillars of Information Providers and Activities to Control Quality of Education. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Published
2021-01-01
How to Cite
Walid, A., & Hadiwinarto, H. (2021). Assessment Instruments of Learning Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Class V Elementary School Students . ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2(1), 17-26. Retrieved from https://siducat.org/index.php/isej/article/view/156