Trends in Research on Self-Efficacy in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Analysis for 2013–2025
Abstract
Self-efficacy has been one of the most widely used psychological constructs in mathematics education research for over three decades. However, the development of research, the intellectual structure of the field, and its relationship to learning approaches and mathematical competence have not been comprehensively developed. This study aims to analyze publication trends, thematic structures, and identify research gaps regarding self-efficacy in mathematics education. The study uses a bibliometric approach to 3,096 Scopus Open Access documents from 2013–2025 that have been screened to ensure their relevance to the field of education. The analysis was conducted using Bibliometrix (R) to broadcast publication performance and VOSviewer to map the co-word network. The results show sharp and consistent growth (Annual Growth Rate 20.47%), with Frontiers in Psychology as the most published platform (197 documents) while EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education remains the most relevant core journal for the mathematics education audience specifically. The co-word mapping identified four thematic clusters—self-efficacy, mathematics teaching and achievement; health and behavior; clinical education and medical competence; as well as procedures and pilot studies. However, the most pedagogically significant finding is the lack of explicit integration between self-efficacy, team-based learning, and mathematical communication in the context of statistics education: combined phrases such as ‘collaborative learning in statistics’ and ‘communication skills in mathematics’ were completely absent (n = 0) among all the documents analyzed, while the individual terms rarely appeared alongside self-efficacy. This finding confirms that research interventions that integrate collaborative learning with self-efficacy strengthening in statistics courses—particularly in higher education contexts that are still underrepresented in the global literature such as Southeast Asia—represent a pressing research agenda and have the potential to make significant pedagogical contributions to the teaching of mathematics and statistics in higher education.
Downloads
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
Bohrnstedt, G. W., Zhang, J., Li, M., Ikoma, S., Park, B. J., & Broer, M. (2024). Mathematics motivation and mathematics performance: Does gender play a role? AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241298272
Borgonovi, F., & Pokropek, A. (2019). Seeing is believing: Task-exposure specificity and the development of mathematics self-efficacy evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000280
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.
Byars-Winston, A., Diestelmann, J., Savoy, J. N., & Hoyt, W. T. (2017). Unique effects and moderators of effects of sources on self-efficacy: A model-based meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000219
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Trends in mathematics education and insights from a meta-review and bibliometric analysis of review studies. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01587-7
Charalambous, M., Hodge, J. A., & Ippolito, K. (2021). Statistically significant learning experiences: Towards building self-efficacy of undergraduate statistics learners through team-based learning. Educational Action Research, 29(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1782240
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/pric91844
de Solla Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024051
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Drijvers, P., Grauwin, S., & Trouche, L. (2020). When bibliometrics met mathematics education research: The case of instrumental orchestration. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52, 1455–1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01169-3
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
Harahap, R. L., Nasution, A. K. P., & Mandasari, L. (2025). Trends of school mathematics education research in the last decade: A bibliometric analytic review. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.27167
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
Julius, R., Abd Halim, M. S., Abdul Hadi, N., Alias, A. N., Mohd Khalid, M. H., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2040. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11329
Khudzari, J., Kurian, J., Tartakovsky, B., & Raghavan, G. S. V. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 136, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002
Liu, R., Jong, C., & Fan, M. (2024). Reciprocal relationship between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics among high school students. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00201-2
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Meng, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2023). The influence of academic self-efficacy on university students' academic performance: The mediating effect of academic engagement. Sustainability, 15(7), 5767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075767
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.190
Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Street, K. E. S., Malmberg, L.-E., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Students' mathematics self-efficacy: A scoping review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0
Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
Vachova, L., Sedlakova, E., & Kvintova, J. (2023). Academic self-efficacy as a precondition for critical thinking in university students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.36
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Yang, Y., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2024). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Multilevel analysis with NAEP 2019. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00204-z
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Improving students' mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 986622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Zhu, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students' mathematics learning interest, mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics test achievements: A secondary analysis of Shanghai data from the international video study Global Teaching InSights. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54, 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01343-9
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Copyright (c) 2026 Nike Astiswijaya, Turmudi Turmudi, Kusnandi Kusnandi, Dadang Juandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
_(3).png)
