Validity of an Assessment Instrument for Measuring Students’ Eco-‎Awareness of Sidoarjo’s Traditional Aquaculture Pond Ecosystem

  • Endy Sri Wigati Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Wisanti Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Raharjo Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords: Eco-Awareness, Instrument Development, Reliability, Traditional Aquatic Pond Ecosystem, Validity

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and obtain preliminary validation evidence for an essay-based instrument assessing senior high school students’ eco-awareness ecological knowledge, attitudes, and behavior through the local context of Sidoarjo’s traditional aquatic pond ecosystem. Using a research and development design adapted from the MEASURE approach, the study included blueprint preparation, item construction, expert validation, revision, pilot testing, and psychometric analysis. The initial instrument comprised seven essay items reviewed by four validators: two university lecturers and two senior high school biology teachers. Pilot testing involved 30 Grade 11 students who had studied ecosystem concepts and were excluded from the main sample. Content validity was evaluated through expert-rating percentages, empirical validity through Pearson item–total correlations, and internal consistency through Cronbach’s alpha. Expert-validation scores ranged from 97.92% to 100%, indicating very high content relevance, construction quality, and linguistic clarity. Six items showed significant item–total correlations ranging from .484 to .774, while one item failed to meet the empirical-validity criterion (r = .092, p = .629) and required revision or removal. The six retained items yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of .656, indicating acceptable preliminary consistency for formative use. These findings suggest that the instrument can support contextual assessment of students’ environmental reasoning and assist biology teachers in diagnosing eco-awareness through locally grounded ecological learning. However, the small pilot sample and limited item pool restrict generalizability; further testing with larger, more diverse samples and broader validity evidence is required before high-stakes use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Barakat, A., AlAli, R., Alotaibi, S., Alrashood, J., Abdullatif, A., & Zaher, A. (2025). Science education as ‎a pathway to sustainable awareness: Teachers’ perceptions on fostering understanding of ‎humans and the environment—A qualitative study. Sustainability, 17(15), Article 7136. ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157136‎

AlAli, R., Al-Barakat, A., Alrosaa, T., Alotaibi, S., Abdullatif, A., & Almughyirah, S. (2025). Science ‎education and environmental identity: An integrative approach to fostering sustainability ‎practices in primary school students. Sustainability, 17(19), Article 8883. ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198883‎

Albu, C., & Lindmeier, A. (2023). Performance assessment in teacher education research—A scoping ‎review of characteristics of assessment instruments in the DACH region. Zeitschrift für ‎Erziehungswissenschaft, 26(3), 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-023-01167-7‎

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: ‎A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, Article 108224. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224‎

Ardoin, N. M., & Heimlich, J. E. (2021). Environmental learning in everyday life: Foundations of meaning ‎and a context for change. Environmental Education Research, 27(12), 1681–1699. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1992354‎

Begum, A., Wang, Q., Qayum, H., Khan, S., & Zaib, K. (2025). Fostering green behaviour through ‎environmental education: A structural equation model of nature connectedness and social ‎dominance orientation. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251378188‎

Benzehaf, B., Razkane, H., & Benzehaf, O. (2025). Exploring university students’ perceptions and ‎engagement in environmental awareness and sustainable practices. Discover Environment, 3(1), ‎Article 247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00462-w

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best ‎practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A ‎primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149‎

Burgos-Espinoza, I. I., García-Alcaraz, J. L., Gil-López, A. J., & Díaz-Reza, J. R. (2025). Effect of ‎environmental knowledge on pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: A comparative ‎analysis between engineering students and professionals in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Journal of ‎Environmental Studies and Sciences, 15(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-‎‎00991-5‎

Cahyani, R. P., Rahmat, A., Hamdiyati, Y., Amprasto, A., & Jamil, M. W. (2025). Does environmental ‎knowledge predict attitudes and behaviors in environmental literacy? Evidence from senior high ‎school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 11(3), 828–840. ‎https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i3.41213‎

Chen, W., & Erfanian, S. (2026). Drivers of students’ pro-environmental behavior in campus ‎environments in Chinese universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1760915. ‎https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1760915‎

Cook, D. A., & Hatala, R. (2016). Validation of educational assessments: A primer for simulation and ‎beyond. Advances in Simulation, 1(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y

Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., Almeida, S., Bennett, P. M., Miranda da Silva, M., ‎Teixeira, G., Nunes, E., Lucas, P., & Gaspar, F. (2024). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and ‎validation of measurement instruments: A practical guideline for novice researchers. Journal of ‎Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 2701–2728. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419714‎

Delgado-Guerrero, Y. M., López-Ramírez, P. A., Viviescas-Beltrán, L. S., & Ríos-Reyes, C. A. (2025). ‎Geoeducation for sustainable rural development: Enhancing environmental literacy through ‎geoscience learning in Guaca, Santander, Colombia. Sustainable Futures, 10, Article 101520. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101520‎

Hsu, C.-H. (2025). Outdoor environmental education as a nature-based solution for “education” and ‎‎“environment”: A new conceptual framework and its pilot application in a coastal community ‎case study in Taiwan. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 29(1), Article 13. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-025-01099-w

Jeronen, E., & Jeronen, J. (2026). Bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable education in biology ‎for promoting sustainability at primary and secondary schools and in teacher education. ‎Education Sciences, 16(2), Article 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020201‎

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). A practical guide to instrument development and score validation in the ‎social sciences: The MEASURE approach. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26(1), ‎‎1–18.‎

Kang, J., & Teig, N. (2025). Which science matters? The role of biology, chemistry, physics, and earth ‎science in shaping students’ environmental attitudes and behaviours. International Journal of ‎Science Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2579584‎

Levy-Feldman, I. (2025). The role of assessment in improving education and promoting educational ‎equity. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020224‎

Lin, S.-H., Sah, A. K., & Hong, Y.-M. (2025). Environmental literacy among the general public in Chiayi ‎County, Taiwan. Sustainability, 17(7), Article 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073108‎

Lye, C.-T., Ng, T.-H., & Law, J.-W. (2024). The role of general and specific pro-environmental education in ‎household waste management in Malaysia: Evidence from quantile regression. Environmental ‎Challenges, 15, Article 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100933‎

Mikkonen, K., Tomietto, M., & Watson, R. (2022). Instrument development and psychometric testing in ‎nursing education research. Nurse Education Today, 119, Article 105603. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105603‎

Musah, E., & Wangila, C. (2024). Inquiry-based ethnoecological conservation approach to improve ‎students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in ‎Education, 1(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i2.11240‎

Rahmania, T. (2024). Exploring school environmental psychology in children and adolescents: The ‎influence of environmental and psychosocial factors on sustainable behavior in Indonesia. ‎Heliyon, 10(18), Article e37881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37881‎

Saro, J. M., Taray, J. D., Cinso, J. S., Ingaling, B. S., Enguio, M. J. A., & Hayon, C. P. B. (2025). Level of ‎attitude, behavior, and awareness of senior high school students toward environmental ‎conservation. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 11(1), 111–124. ‎https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.37861‎

Sarwi, Fathonah, S., Winarto, Fatimah, S., Sari, E. F., & Fadilah, A. M. (2025). Ethnoscience and local ‎wisdom in science education for conservation: A systematic review with bibliometric mapping. ‎Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(7), Article 2026298. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026298‎

Situmorang, R. P., & Tarigan, S. D. (2018). Cultivating students’ environmental awareness by creating a ‎bottle garden in school: A qualitative study. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(3), ‎‎263–270. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6785‎

Sotero, M. C., Alves, Â. G. C., Arandas, J. K. G., & Medeiros, M. F. T. (2020). Local and scientific knowledge ‎in the school context: Characterization and content of published works. Journal of Ethnobiology ‎and Ethnomedicine, 16(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00373-5‎

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in ‎science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2‎

Ullah, R., Harrington, J., Farea, A., Otreba, M., Carroll, S., & McKenna, T. (2026). Digital maturity ‎assessment tools for the construction industry: A PRISMA-ScR scoping review. Buildings, 16(1), ‎Article 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010239‎

Valdivia-Salazar, C., Serquén, O., Guevara, L., Bravo-Jaico, J., Alarcón, R., Germán, N., Aquino, J., Maquen-‎Niño, G. L. E., & Moreno Heredia, A. (2025). Development and validation of an instrument to ‎assess the maturity of digital transformation in higher education institutions. Frontiers in ‎Education, 10, Article 1691178. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1691178‎

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ academic ‎development. Education Sciences, 15(3), Article 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343‎

Wibowo, A. M., Utaya, S., Wahjoedi, W., Zubaidah, S., Amin, S., & Prasad, R. R. (2024). Critical thinking ‎and collaboration skills on environmental awareness in project-based science learning. Jurnal ‎Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.48561‎

Wibowo, N. A., Sumarmi, S., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Kodama, Y. (2023). Students’ environmental care ‎attitude: A study at Adiwiyata public high school based on the New Ecological Paradigm. ‎Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118651‎

Xin, J. J., & Lo, Y. Y. (2025). Developing the CLIL teacher assessment literacy inventory. System, 133, ‎Article 103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103776‎

Xiong, Z., Song, Y., & Zhu, R. (2025). Pedagogical strategies for teaching environmental literacy in ‎secondary school education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(20), Article 9104. ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209104‎

Zebua, N., Ziraluo, Y. P. B., & Zebua, E. N. K. (2025). Environmental conservation in biology learning: An ‎effort to increase students’ awareness of environmental issues. International Journal of Advances ‎in Educational Research, 1(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.62941/ijaer.v1i3.114‎

Published
2026-07-12
How to Cite
Wigati, E. S., Wisanti, & Raharjo. (2026). Validity of an Assessment Instrument for Measuring Students’ Eco-‎Awareness of Sidoarjo’s Traditional Aquaculture Pond Ecosystem. ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal, 7(3), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v7i3.2523