Differential Effects of the Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Gender-Based Analysis in Environmental Change Learning
Abstract
The development of critical thinking skills is a key objective in 21st-century science education, particularly in learning contexts involving complex environmental issues. However, students’ critical thinking abilities remain relatively low due to the dominance of teacher-centered instructional practices. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Auditory, Intellectually, and Repetition (AIR) learning model in enhancing students’ critical thinking skills in environmental change and conservation learning, as well as to analyze differences based on gender. A quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design was employed, involving 73 tenth-grade students divided into experimental and control classes. Data were collected using an essay-based critical thinking test developed based on Ennis’ indicators, including interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The results indicate that students in the experimental group achieved significantly higher posttest scores (M = 88.19) and N-Gain (g = 0.72, high category) compared to the control group (M = 60.88; g = 0.21, low category). Improvement was observed across all critical thinking indicators, with the highest gains in advanced clarification and basic skill development. Two-way ANOVA results reveal that the instructional model has a significant effect on students’ critical thinking skills (p < 0.05), while gender and the interaction between model and gender are not statistically significant. These findings demonstrate that the AIR model is effective and inclusive for both male and female students. The study implies that integrating active, discussion-based, and reinforcement-oriented learning models with environmental contexts can enhance students’ higher-order thinking and support meaningful engagement with sustainability issues.
Downloads
References
Afryanto, G. F. (2021). Efektifitas Pembelajaran dengan Metode AIR (Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition) dalam Menumbuhkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. EDUCATOR : Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik Dan Kependidikan, 1(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.51878/educator.v1i2.747
Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan, U. (2020). The Influence of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model Assisted by Realia Media to Improve Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skill of Primary School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2(volume-9-issue-4-october-2020), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1635
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Andriyani, F. D., K, B. H. C., Nisa, A. F., Masjid, A. Al, Cahayani, B. H., & Kunci, K. (2025). Implementation of Inclusive Curriculum in Realizing Child- Friendly Education. 9(3), 208–222.
Ardiansyah, A. I., Putra, A. K., & Nikitina, N. (2024). Investigating Problem-Based Learning Model’s Impact on Student’s Critical Thinking Skills in Environmental Conservation Context. Jambura Geo Education Journal, 5(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.37905/jgej.v5i2.26110
Ardiansyah, A., Putra, A., & Nikitina, N. (2024). Investigating Problem-Based Learning Model’s Impact on High School Student’s Critical Thinking Skills in Environmental Conservation Context. JAMBURA GEO EDUCATION JOURNAL, 5, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.37095/jgej.v5i2.26110
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
Arroyo, I., OOLF, B., & Beal, C. (2006). Addressing Cognitive Differences and Gender During Problem Solving. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 3.
Arviani, F. P., Wahyudin, D., & Dewi, L. (2023). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning Model in Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(4), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i4.65606
Bangeles, E. W., Ellan, F. G., Vigil, R., & Pedroso, J. E. (2025). Higher Order Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Social Studies Teachers. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/0b1nny72
Barrera-Verdugo, G., & Durán-Sandoval, D. (2024). Influence of moral reasoning and environmental concern on sustainable food consumption behaviors: A gender comparison among university students. Cleaner Waste Systems, 9, 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100164
Bayani, F., Rokhmat, J., Hakim, A., & Sukarso, A. (2025). Research Trends in Analytical Thinking Skills for Science Education: Insights, Pedagogical Approaches, and Future Directions. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 2(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14142
Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: the mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75379-0
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Casetta, E. (2023). Climate Change and Nature Conservation (pp. 821–844). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_151
Cincera, J., Kroufek, R., & Bogner, F. X. (2023). The perceived effect of environmental and sustainability education on environmental literacy of Czech teenagers. Environmental Education Research, 29(9), 1276–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2107618
Erstad, O., & Siddiq, F. (2023). Educational assessment of 21st century skills—novel initiatives, yet a lack of systemic transformation. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 245–255). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09038-2
Facione, P. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
Feng, Q., Luo, H., Li, W., Chen, T., & Song, N. (2023). Effects of gender diversity on college students’ collaborative learning: From individual gender to gender pairing. Heliyon, 9(6), e16237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16237
Fitriani, S. R., Doyan, A., Taufik, M., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). The Effect of the Guided Inquiry Model Assisted by PhET Media on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3527–3532. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.4852
Fonseca, C. R., Paterno, G. B., Guadagnin, D. L., Venticinque, E. M., Overbeck, G. E., Ganade, G., Metzger, J. P., Kollmann, J., Sauer, J., Cardoso, M. Z., Lopes, P. F. M., Oliveira, R. S., Pillar, V. D., & Weisser, W. W. (2021). Conservation biology: four decades of problem- and solution-based research. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 19(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.03.003
García-Carmona, A. (2025). Scientific Thinking and Critical Thinking in Science Education. Science & Education, 34(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00460-5
Hačatrjana, L., & Namsone, D. (2024). Breaking Down the Concept of Students’ Thinking and Reasoning Skills for Implementation in the Classroom. Journal of Intelligence, 12(11), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110109
Handoko, A., Hidayah, N., Farhan Barata, M., Oktafiani, R., & Dwi Kesumawardani, A. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X. Jurnal Biogenerasi, 10(1), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v10i1.4915
Hillary, G., Djulia, E., & Hasibuan, R. H. (2023). Analysis Critical Thinking Ability and Environmental Care Attitude of Junior High School Students on Global Warming Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2383–2390. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2603
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher Order Thinking Skills from Elementary to Master Students in Environmental Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-8-2(volume8-issue4.html), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Ignacio, J., Chen, H.-C., & Roy, T. (2022). Advantages and challenges of fostering cognitive integration through virtual collaborative learning: a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01026-6
Ismeirita, I., Ahman, E., Dahlan, D., & Supendra, D. (2025). Identifying Key Factors Influencing the Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Students: A Systematic Literature Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.6627
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention☆. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
Kay, R., MacDonald, T., & DiGiuseppe, M. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x
Kusumaningsih, W., Saputra, H. A., & Aini, A. N. (2019). Cognitive style and gender differences in a conceptual understanding of mathematics students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042017
Leal Filho, W., Vargas, V. R., Salvia, A. L., Brandli, L. L., Pallant, E., Klavins, M., Ray, S., Moggi, S., Maruna, M., Conticelli, E., Ayanore, M. A., Radovic, V., Gupta, B., Sen, S., Paço, A., Michalopoulou, E., Saikim, F. H., Koh, H. L., Frankenberger, F., … Vaccari, M. (2019). The role of higher education institutions in sustainability initiatives at the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.059
Lin, S., & Wong, G. K. W. (2024). Gender Differences in Computational Thinking Skills among Primary and Secondary School Students: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(7), 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070790
Liu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, C., Xu, Y., Chen, J., & Cheng, Y. (2024). K-12 students’ higher-order thinking skills: Conceptualization, components, and evaluation indicators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101551
Ma, Y. (2023). Exploration of flipped classroom approach to enhance critical thinking skills. Heliyon, 9(11), e20895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20895
Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young Students’ Reasoning About Ecosystems: the Role of Systems Thinking, Knowledge, Conceptions, and Representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
Marnı, S., Alıman, M., Suyono, Roekhan, & Harsıatı, T. (2020). Students’ critical thinking skills based on gender and knowledge group. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.44
Martín-Alguacil, N., & Avedillo, L. (2024). Student-Centered Active Learning Improves Performance in Solving Higher-Level Cognitive Questions in Health Sciences Education. International Medical Education, 3(3), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime3030026
Mengesha, A. K., Ayele, H. S., Misker, M. F., & Beyna, A. T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching–learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06105-7
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
Mualimin, M., & Pamungkas, R. (2024). Holistic higher-order thinking in solving environmental problems: A profile of Indonesian undergraduate students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(3), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.36426
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Nabilla Salma, & Zakia Fariza Umami. (2024). Exploring Gender Differences In Science Engagement and Achievement: A Metaanalytic Approach. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 1(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijmse.v1i1.79
Ni’mah, N. (2022). Analisis Indikator Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu dalam Kurikulum 2013. Anterior Jurnal, 22(Special-1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v22iSpecial-1.3220
Pahrudin, A., Irwandani, Aridan, M., & Barata, M. F. (2025). Teacher Readiness for Deep Learning in Islamic Education: A Rasch Model Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i4.9573
Pratiwi, R., & Doyan, A. (2024). Effect of Science Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability: A Review. International Journal of Science Education and Science, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.56566/ijses.v1i1.105
Reffhaug, M. B. A., & Lysgaard, J. A. (2024). Conceptualisations of ‘critical thinking’ in environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 30(9), 1519–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2363848
RISTANTO, R., SABRİNA, A., & KOMALA, R. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills of Environmental Changes: A Biological Instruction Using Guided Discovery Learning-Argument Mapping (GDL-AM). Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.10.9.1
Rossi, I. V., de Lima, J. D., Sabatke, B., Nunes, M. A. F., Ramirez, G. E., & Ramirez, M. I. (2021). Active learning tools improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education: Experiences in an online course during the
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
Saenab, S., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Lestari, S. R. (2020). ReCODE to Re-Code: An Instructional Model to Accelerate Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Education Sciences, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010002
Saharuddin, Ismawati, I., Dassa, A., & Rosidah. (2021). The effects of the implementation of Auditory, Intellectual, Repetition (AIR) learning model in mathematical problem solving ability. International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM), 611(ICoESM), 1–5. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icoesm-21/125965645
Sapriati, A., Rahayu, U., Sausan, I., Sekarwinahyu, M., & Anam, R. S. (2024). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking in Biology Education Programs within Open and Distance Learning Systems. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/7sty9026
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677
Shanti, M. R. S., Istiyono, E., & Munadi, S. (2022). The effectiveness of learning to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(5), 1576–1587. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7220
Sjöblom, P., Wolff, L.-A., & Sundman, J. (2023). Climate change as a socio-scientific issue in upper secondary education. In Developing a Didactic Framework Across and Beyond School Subjects (pp. 182–196). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367260-17
Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2022). Assessing Indonesian student inductive reasoning: Rasch analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101132
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Styers, M. L., Van Zandt, P. A., & Hayden, K. L. (2018). Active Learning in Flipped Life Science Courses Promotes Development of Critical Thinking Skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar39. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-11-0332
Sukarma, I. K., Budayasa, I. K., & Suwarsono. (2019). Gender, Cognitive Style and Its Relationship with Critical Thinking. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 9(5), 62–67. www.iosrjournals.org
Taufik, L. M., Widodo, A., & Surtikanti, H. K. (2024). Development of a systems-thinking-based assessment instrument for environmental literacy and problem-solving skills in SDG 6 contexts. 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v4i1.173
Tesfaw, B. K., Ayele, M. A., & Wondimuneh, T. E. (2024). Context-based problem-posing and solving instructional approach and students’ engagement in learning data handling. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2389486
UNDP. (2020). Gender Equality Strategy: 2020 Annual Report. 1–15.
Wardani, I. S., & Fiorintina, E. (2023). Building Critical Thinking Skills of 21st Century Students through Problem Based Learning Model. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(3), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i3.58789
Wilson, K., & Defianty, M. (2024). The critical challenge for ELT in Indonesia: Overcoming barriers in fostering critical thinking in testing-oriented countries. TESOL in Context, 33(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2024vol33no1art2011
Xhomara, N. (2022). Critical thinking: student-centred teaching approach and personalised learning, as well as previous education achievements, contribute to critical thinking skills of students. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2022.119513
Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender Differences in Large-Scale and Small-Scale Spatial Ability: A Systematic Review Based on Behavioral and Neuroimaging Research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128
Zhang, X., & Kim, H.-J. (2024). Exploring the Factors Influencing Student Engagement in University English Classes. English Teaching, 79(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.79.1.202403.121
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Farhan Barata, Suci Nur Aisyah, Dafa Epandi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





