Mapping the Conditions of Scientific Literacy and Social Literacy of Elementary School Students: Qualitative Analysis

  • Anistia Rizki Khoirun Nisa
  • Herpratiwi Universitas Lampung
  • Dwi Yulianti Universitas Lampung
  • Sumarti Universitas Lampung
  • Muhammad Nurwahidin Universitas Lampung
Keywords: Elementary Education, Integrated Science and Social Studies, Qualitative Study, Scientific Literacy, Social Literacy

Abstract

Scientific literacy and social literacy are essential competencies that should be developed from the early stages of formal education, particularly within integrated science and social studies learning. This study aims to map the current condition of elementary school students’ scientific and social literacy in Integrated Science and Social Studies learning in Lampung Province, Indonesia. A qualitative approach with a descriptive exploratory design was employed to obtain an in-depth understanding of students’ literacy conditions in authentic classroom contexts. The research participants consisted of elementary school teachers and students selected through purposive sampling based on their direct involvement in Integrated Science and Social Studies instruction. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation studies involving lesson modules, textbooks, and student worksheets. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which includes data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Data trustworthiness was ensured through source triangulation, technique triangulation, and member checking. The findings reveal that students’ scientific literacy remains at a basic level. Students were generally able to observe phenomena but experienced difficulty in reasoning, interpreting information, explaining causal relationships, and applying concepts to real-life contexts. Similarly, students’ social literacy had developed in terms of basic interaction and group work but had not yet reached the level of critical social understanding and reflective social reasoning. These conditions were influenced by the dominance of conventional teaching methods, limited exploratory activities, weak contextualization of learning materials, and suboptimal use of technology. This study implies that strengthening students’ scientific and social literacy requires a transformation of instructional practices toward more inquiry-based, contextual, reflective, and student-centered learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Herpratiwi, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Dwi Yulianti, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Sumarti, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Muhammad Nurwahidin, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Apriliana, A., Tatat Hartati, Dadang Sunendar, & Rahman. (2022). Literacy Learning in Early Grades: Teacher Thought on Teaching Literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i4.49994

Barata, M. F., Aisyah, S. N., & Epandi, D. (2025). Differential Effects of the Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Gender-Based Analysis in Environmental Change Learning. Indonesian Science Education Journal, 6(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v6i1.2066

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2021). Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100376

Chen, J. J., Ren, Y., & O’Neill, S. (2024). Exploring the Literacy Experiences of Preservice Early Childhood Teachers: Social and Contextual Influences, and Implications for Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101042

Cheng, Y. C. (2020). Education Reform Phenomenon: A Typology of Multiple Dilemmas. In Handbook of Education Policy Studies (pp. 85–109). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8347-2_5

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Erwin Akib, Muhammad Erwinto Imran, Saiyidah Mahtari, Muhammad Rifqi Mahmud, Anggy Giri Prawiyogy, Irfan Supriatna, & MT. Hartono Ikhsan. (2020). Study on Implementation of Integrated Curriculum in Indonesia. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i1.24

Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2023). Fostering Chemistry Students’ Scientific Literacy for Responsible Citizenship through Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning (SSIBL). Sustainability, 15(8), 6442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086442

Hačatrjana, L., & Namsone, D. (2024). Breaking Down the Concept of Students’ Thinking and Reasoning Skills for Implementation in the Classroom. Journal of Intelligence, 12(11), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110109

Handoko, A., Hidayah, N., Farhan Barata, M., Oktafiani, R., & Dwi Kesumawardani, A. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Biogenerasi, 10(1), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v10i1.4915

Hanemann, U., & Robinson, C. (2022). Rethinking literacy from a lifelong learning perspective in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals and the International Conference on Adult Education. International Review of Education, 68(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09949-7

Hanum, C. B., As’ary, Y., Komariah, M., & Maftuh, B. (2024). The Implementation of IPAS (Natural Science and Social Studies) in Elementary School: Learning Plot and Teacher Consideration. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 16(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v16i1.58361

Haq, H., & Wakidi. (2024). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Secondary Schools in the Digital Era. International Journal of Post Axial, 2(4), 215–228.

Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Transforming Education in Indonesia: The Impact and Challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026–5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31

Junianto, R., Jamil, Ningsih, T., & Siswadi. (2026). The Strategic Role of Social Studies Teachers in Developing Deep Learning-Based Curriculum to Face the Challenges of the Digital Era. Sosioedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 15(2), 420–430.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia.

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Le, H. Van, & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: the role of social constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973

Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M. M., Zulnaidi, H., & Fadzil, H. M. (2023). Using of reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(7), e18269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18269

Marcinauskas, L., Iljinas, A., Čyvienė, J., & Stankus, V. (2024). Problem-Based Learning versus Traditional Learning in Physics Education for Engineering Program Students. Education Sciences, 14(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020154

Maulani, S., Musthafa, B., Damaianti, V. S., & Agustin, M. (2021). Types of Literacy Learning in Early Grades: What Does the Teacher Do? PrimaryEdu : Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v5i2.2639

McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the Challenges of Science Education in the 21st Century: New Opportunities for Scientific Literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.4.35

Monggun Maulidiya Siregar, M. Joharis, Nova Muhairani Nasution, & Yolanda Vera Nicole Sitinjak. (2025). The Importance of Literacy in the World of Education: “How Important is Literacy Really.” International Journal of Educational Development, 2(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v2i2.297

Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43, 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601

Nawalinsi, N., Abdulkarim, A., Ruhimat, M., & Winarti, M. (2024). Social Literacy in Social Studies Learning for Junior High School Students in Lahat City. JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning), 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v9i1.4855

O’Conner, R., De Feyter, J., Carr, A., Luo, J. L., & Romm, H. (2017). A Review of the Literature on Social and Emotional Learning for Students Ages 3-8: Outcomes for Different Student Populations and Settings (Part 4 of 4). Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic, 1–13. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/review-literature-on-social-emotional-learning/docview/1895979247/se-2?accountid=28822%0Ahttp://gegnir.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/hvar?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=unknown&

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

OECD. (2021a). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

OECD. (2021b). The Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). Young People Through Climate Literacy.

Oktaviani, M., Dwihapsari, K., Islami, M. N., Dewi, N. P., Fadhilah, R. N., & Palupi, Z. D. (2023). Cognitive Development of Elementary School Children in Developing Critical Thinking Ability and Understanding Mathematical Concepts. International Education Trend Issues, 1(3), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v1i3.178

Ossai, J., & Alordiah, C. (2024). Environmental Education in Social Studies: the Integrated Evaluation Model for Environmental Education (IEMEE). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 34(2), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.23917/jpis.v34i2.6136

Palermo, E., Laut, J., Nov, O., Cappa, P., & Porfiri, M. (2017). Spatial memory training in a citizen science context. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.017

Pramudita, R. L. (2024). Social Studies Learning Models That Foster Social Literacy and Civic Engagement Among High School Students. SMART: Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.61677/smart.v2i1.586

Qablan, A., Alkaabi, A. M., Aljanahi, M. H., & Almaamari, S. A. (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning: Encouraging Exploration and Curiosity in the Classroom. In In book: Cutting-Edge Innovations in Teaching, Leadership, Technology, and Assessment (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch001

Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A. M., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23), e39988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988

Şeker, M. (2023). A study on how environmental issues are discussed in social studies textbooks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 21325–21352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03532-2

Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148

Suryanti, S., Nursalim, M., Choirunnisa, N. L., & Yuliana, I. (2024). STEAM-Project-Based Learning: A Catalyst for Elementary School Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-13-(volume-13-issue-1-january-2024), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.1

Sutriani, S. (2025). Literacy Development Through Literature: A Comprehensive Review. Majapahit Journal of English Studies, 2(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v2i2.137

Szabó, F., & Csépes, I. (2023). Constructivism in language pedagogy. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00136

T Kotsis, K. (2025). The Impact of Scientific Literacy on Psychological Well-Being: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(4), 1761–1766. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2025.5.4.4848

Taber, K. S. (2024). Educational Constructivism. Encyclopedia, 4(4), 1534–1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040100

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2020). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times (Jossey-Bass (ed.)).

Tytler, R. (2025). Climate Change Education and the PISA 2025 Science Framework. v. https://doi.org/10.26714/uwc.v3.v.2025

UNESCO. (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness and Competencies. United Nations Educational.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2

Verawati, Y., Supriatna, A., Wahyu, W., & Setiaji, B. (2020). Identification of student’s collaborative skills in learning salt hydrolysis through sharing and jumping task design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042058

Villarreal Arroyo, Y. P., Peñabaena-Niebles, R., & Berdugo Correa, C. (2023). Influence of environmental conditions on students’ learning processes: A systematic review. Building and Environment, 231, 110051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110051

Zumrotun, E., Narimo, S., Prayitno, H. J., Fauziati, E., Ahmad, & Muhibbin. (2025). Teachers’ Needs Analysis of Integrated Science and Social Studies Materials for Holistic Learning in Primary School. 88–98. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/epic/article/view/4785?utm_source

Published
2025-05-03
How to Cite
Nisa, A. R. K., Herpratiwi, Yulianti, D., Sumarti, & Nurwahidin, M. (2025). Mapping the Conditions of Scientific Literacy and Social Literacy of Elementary School Students: Qualitative Analysis. ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal, 6(2), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v6i2.2176
Section
Articles