English in The BRICS Eclipse: Learning Beyond Empire

  • Iskandarsyah Siregar Universitas Nasional, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia‎
  • Awang Azman Awang Pawi Universitas Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords: BRICS eclipse, English as a Lingua ‎Franca, English learning, Linguistic ‎capital, Post-imperial English, World ‎Englishes‎

Abstract

This study examines the changing ideological and pedagogical position of English in the context of BRICS expansion, particularly as the bloc increasingly represents a multilingual, multipolar, and Global South-oriented geopolitical formation. Rather than assuming that English is declining, this article argues that English is being re-semiotized from an imperial centre-language into a negotiated bridge-language for diplomacy, education, scientific circulation, trade, technological exchange, and intercultural communication. Employing a multidisciplinary mixed-methods approach, the study integrates sociolinguistics, World Englishes, English as a Lingua Franca, linguistic imperialism, linguistic capital theory, critical discourse analysis, and geopolitical interpretation. The data were drawn from institutional BRICS documents, global English proficiency indicators, and public geopolitical discourse from 2024–2026, including the period of Indonesia’s full membership in BRICS. The findings show that English remains a powerful form of linguistic capital, yet its symbolic authority is no longer exclusively anchored in Anglophone Western institutions. Institutional and economic data demonstrate the growing demographic and purchasing-power-parity weight of BRICS, while English proficiency data reveal uneven linguistic capital among member states. Qualitative discourse evidence further indicates that BRICS discourse foregrounds multilateralism, governance reform, development, sovereignty, cultural plurality, and South–South cooperation rather than Anglocentric imitation. This study concludes that English in the BRICS eclipse is not “less English” but “different English”: globally functional, strategically necessary, and ideologically repositioned. The implication is that English education in BRICS societies and partner countries should move beyond native-speaker dependency by integrating linguistic accuracy, intercultural intelligibility, discourse-critical awareness, geopolitical literacy, multilingual comparison, and epistemic sovereignty.

References

Almohawes, M. (2026). A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of news on the web representing Saudi ‎Vision 2030. Frontiers in Communication, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1801652‎
Associated Press. (2025, January 6). Indonesia is admitted to the BRICS bloc of developing nations. AP News. ‎https://apnews.com/article/brazil-brics-indonesia-membership-‎c05b0c8e2ae493f9046479e62a45d8fa
Ato, R. A. (2025). Language and power: A critical discourse analysis of political speeches in English. Journal ‎of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 6(3), 67–82. ‎https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i3.651‎
Boonsuk, Y. (2026). When EFL meets ELF: Negotiating intelligibility and intercultural communication in ‎ASEAN EMI classrooms. Language Awareness, 1–31. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2026.2626503‎
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). ‎Harvard University Press.‎
BRICS Brazil. (2025a, May 2). BRICS GDP outperforms the global average and accounts for 40% of the world ‎economy. https://brics.br/en/news/brics-gdp-outperforms-global-average-accounts-for-40-of-‎world-economy
BRICS Brazil. (2025b, January 20). Frequently asked questions about the BRICS. https://brics.br/en/about-‎the-brics/frequently-asked-questions-about-the-brics
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.‎
Charli, M. S., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). Learning how research design methods work: A review of ‎Creswell’s Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. The Qualitative ‎Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901‎
Cicero, T. (2025). Forecasting the scientific production volumes of G7 and BRICS countries in a comparative ‎analysis. Publications, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13010006‎
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ‎approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.‎
Darwis, D., & Setiawan, A. A. (2025). Indonesia’s strategic diplomacy and BRICS membership: Opportunities ‎and risks in a multipolar global order. Global South Review, 7(2), 59–75. ‎https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.106796‎
de Carvalho, G., Gruzd, S., & Wu, Y.-S. (2025). The BRICS expanded: Shaped by—or shaping—the global ‎order? South African Journal of International Affairs, 32(1–2), 1–8. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2025.2525312‎
E’tibor Bekmurod qizi, T. (2025). The role of the English language in international education. Advances in ‎Science and Education, 1(09), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.70728/edu.v01.i09.021‎
EF Education First. (2025). EF English Proficiency Index 2025. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/‎
Fàbregues, S., Sáinz, M., Romano, M. J., Escalante-Barrios, E. L., Younas, A., & López-Pérez, B.-S. (2023). Use ‎of mixed methods research in intervention studies to increase young people’s interest in STEM: A ‎systematic methodological review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. ‎https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956300‎
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.‎
Faizi, F., Sawas, M., Abohassan, D., Stojanović, I., & Selaković, M. (2025). Analyzing the impact of ‎macroeconomic conditions on GDP growth: BRICS vs. G7 countries. Ekonomski Horizonti, 27(3), 277–‎‎295. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor2503277F
Gauttam, P., Singh, B., Singh, S., Bika, S. L., & Tiwari, R. P. (2024). Education as a soft power resource: A ‎systematic review. Heliyon, 10(1), e23736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23736‎
Gogazeh, Z., Al-Afif, A., & Jarrah, M. (2026). Attitudes toward Spanish as added linguistic capital in Jordan’s ‎English-dominant higher education landscape. Ampersand, 16, 100261. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2026.100261‎
Government of Brazil. (2025, January 9). Brazil announces Indonesia as full member of BRICS. ‎https://www.gov.br/planalto/en/latest-news/2025/01/brazil-announces-indonesia-as-full-‎member-of-brics
Iqbal, Y., Perwita, A. A. B., & Rudy, E. (2025). The impacts of Indonesia’s membership in the BRICS on the ‎defense sector: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, ‎‎3(3), 784–797. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijecs.v3i3.7057‎
Islam, M. Z. ul, Anwar, B., & Iqbal, T. (2026). English as linguistic capital: A socio-cultural analysis of language ‎preference among Pakistani youth. Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences and Management ‎Practices, 5(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.61503/cissmp.v5i1.388‎
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge.‎
Juned, M., Martin, A., Saripudin, M. H., & Salam, S. (2025). Bridging polarities: Implications of ASEAN member ‎states’ proposals for joining BRICS and OECD on Indo-Pacific geoeconomics. Social Sciences & ‎Humanities Open, 12, 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102101‎
Kachru, B. B. (Ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.‎
Kaushik, S., Mahipal, P., & Patel, M. K. (2024). BRICS expansion: Reshaping global economic governance. ‎ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(6), 3129–3136. ‎https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.3635‎
Khadka, B. K. (2024). The English in South Asian contexts: Exploring historical development to present role ‎in education. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 179–189. ‎https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v2i1.3762‎
Koch, M. (2022). State-civil society relations in Gramsci, Poulantzas and Bourdieu: Strategic implications for ‎the degrowth movement. Ecological Economics, 193, 107275. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107275‎
Larregue, J., & Pavie, A. (2026). English or perish? The value of linguistic capital in the social sciences and ‎humanities. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251406882‎
Moghadam, S. R., & Barani, G. (2025). The impact of linguistic vs. cultural imperialism on language learning. ‎Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438849‎
Myajaya, R. A. (2025). Indonesia’s interests and challenges in joining BRICS. Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, ‎Hukum dan Humaniora, 3(1), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v3i1.2179‎
OECD. (2025). OECD skills outlook 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/26163cd3-en
Patel, M., Solly, M., & Copeland, S. (2023). The future of English: Global perspectives (B. O’Sullivan & Y. Jin, ‎Eds.). British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/future-of-english
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. Routledge.‎
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.‎
Reuters. (2025, January 7). Indonesia joins BRICS bloc as full member, Brazil says. ‎https://www.reuters.com/world/indonesia-join-brics-bloc-full-member-brazil-says-2025-01-06/‎
Sadeghpour, M., & D’Angelo, J. (2022). World Englishes and “Global Englishes”: Competing or complementary ‎paradigms? Asian Englishes, 24(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2076368‎
Salsabilla, M., & Nugroho, B. W. (2025). Analysis of the impact of Indonesia’s membership in BRICS: ‎Opportunities and challenges in the global era. Journal of Social Research, 4(10), 3030–3039. ‎https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i10.2842‎
Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2025, July 6). Indonesia promotes global trade, peace, and reform in ‎the 2025 BRICS Leaders’ Declaration. https://setkab.go.id/en/indonesia-promotes-global-trade-‎peace-reform-in-2025-brics-leaders-declaration/‎
Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and ‎cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, ‎‎5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9‎
Twersky, S. E., Jefferson, R., Garcia-Ortiz, L., Williams, E., & Pina, C. (2024). The impact of limited English ‎proficiency on healthcare access and outcomes in the U.S.: A scoping review. Healthcare, 12(3), 364. ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030364‎
Yang, L., & Chano, J. (2025). The impacts of blended learning on English language proficiency in higher ‎education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Studies, 15(2), 83. ‎https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v15n2p83‎
Zhang, H. (2024). The impact of English language development on internationalization of education. Lecture ‎Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 34(1), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-‎‎7048/34/20231933‎
Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Siregar, I., & Pawi, A. A. A. (2025). English in The BRICS Eclipse: Learning Beyond Empire. JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia, 5(3), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.62159/jpi.v5i3.2433
Section
Articles