Intergenerational Communication Patterns between Principals and Teachers in Improving Learning Quality: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
This study aims to map, synthesize, and analyze empirical evidence on intergenerational communication patterns between school principals (Baby Boomers, Generation X, Millennials) and teachers (Generation X, Millennials, Generation Z) and its impact on learning quality. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A search of Google Scholar, ERIC, and Scopus databases (2017–2026) identified 487 articles, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria for in-depth analysis. Results: Findings reveal five key insights: (1) each generation exhibits distinct communication styles shaped by social context and technology adoption; (2) generational gaps create barriers in media preferences, formality norms, and feedback expectations; (3) Generation X principals employing care-based communicative leadership effectively bridge these differences; (4) multi-channel strategies, two-way mentoring, and an inclusive climate enhance cross-generational communication; and (5) effective intergenerational communication significantly improves teacher motivation, collaboration, and learning quality. Novelty: This study uniquely synthesizes cross-generational dynamics across four generations within school leadership, highlighting the underexplored role of Generation X principals as effective mediators. Practical Implication: Findings inform school management policies that are responsive to generational diversity, promoting adaptive communication frameworks. Contribution: The study contributes a consolidated evidence base on intergenerational communication in educational leadership, offering actionable strategies to improve learning quality through enhanced teacher-principal interactions.
References
Aswani, D., & Otiende, J. O. (2025). Effective Workplace Communication: Organizational Subcultures and Communication Preferences for Gen Z’s. Journal of the Kenya National Commission for UNESCO, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.62049/jkncu.v5i1.234
Azorín, C., Portela, A., Nieto, J. M., & Alfageme, M. B. (2022). Professional relationships both within and outside the school: barriers and opportunities from an intergenerational perspective. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-08-2022-0047
Bencsik, A., Gabriella, H. C., & Tímea, J. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. In The Academy of Management Review (Vol. 27, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/4134391
Chillakuri, B., & Mahanandia, R. (2018). Generation Z entering the workforce: the need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-01-2018-0006
Chine, H. K., Redd, S. J., Erica, T., Austin, E., & Louis, L. B. (2025). Generational Differences in Cultural Norms: Analysis between Communication Styles of Gen-Z and Gen-Y in Noveleta, Cavite. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(2), 1247–1252. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2025.5.2.3973
Cogin, J. (2012). Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(11), 2268–2294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610967
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Doise, C., & Hert, D. S. (2025). Generation X vs Generation Z: Clash of the Generations. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica, 76(3), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.56126/76.3.27
Edge, K., Descours, K., & Frayman, K. (2016). Generation X School Leaders as Agents of Care: Leader and Teacher Perspectives from Toronto, New York City and London. Societies, 6(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020008
Fedorov, A., Ilaltdinova, E., Guseva, L., & Frolova, S. (2021). Convention of Generations in the Modern Educational Environment. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 19(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2020.1791780
Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., & Heikkinen, H. L. . (2018). Inter-generational learning of teachers: what and how do teachers learn from older and younger colleagues? European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1448781
Geeraerts, K., Van den Bossche, P., Vanhoof, J., & Moolenaar, N. (2017). Intergenerational professional relationships in elementary school teams: a social network approach. Front Learning Research, 5(2), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i2.293
Halukha, L. (2025). Modern approaches to resolving intergenerational conflict in education: innovations and practical recommendations. Eduweb, 19(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.02.13
Han, M., & Moon, K. (2022). Generation Gap and Conflict in teaching society: Focusing on the Inter-Generation Perception and Evaluation of Elementary School Teachers. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 30(3), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2022.30.3.51
Harmen, H., Ginting, K. G., Napitupulu, D. F., Siagian, Y. E., Saragih, S. H. B., Ramadhan, B. P., & Marpaung, A. K. B. (2025). Solusi Perbedaan Komunikasi Bisnis Antar Generasi di Lingkungan Kerja : Generasi Z, Milenial dan Generasi X. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 8(4), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v8i4.1305
Hatfield, J. L. (2025). From chalkboard to smartboard: an exploratory study of experienced teachers’ perspectives on student generations X, Y, Z and Alpha. Education and Information Technologies, 30(16), 22595–22647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13645-y
Hee, L. S., & Yeojin, Y. (2024). Work values and communication styles among Generation X, Y, and Z nurses: A cross‐sectional study. International Nursing Review, 71(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12863
Irshad, S., & Amjad, A. I. (2025). Bridging generations, building minds: The psychological pathways linking intergenerational bonding, teacher motivation, and student success. Acta Psychologica, 259(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105458
Jenei, S., & Machova, R. (2024). Motivations of generations: The importance of leadership and communication styles at the workplace. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(16), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9602
Kurniawati, A. E., Hamamah, H., & Muttaqin, S. (2025). Exploring Teacher–Student Talk in English for Young Learners (EYL) Led by a Gen Z Teacher: A FIACS-Based Case Study in Indonesia. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 9(1), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v9i1.11027
Lagmay, M., & Florendo, H. (2025). Generational Differences in Work Values Between Gen X and Y Public School Teachers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.412
Lazaro, B. L. G., De Castro, L. B., Henson, L. D., Cainglet, R. G., Del Rosario, L. Z., Buhain, V. I., & Tiratira, N. L. (2024). Unveiling The Lived Experiences of School Heads in Managing Intergenerational Diversity among Proficient Teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(9), 3711–3811. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.31
Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913
Mentado‐Labao, T., Serrat‐Antolí, N., Rodríguez‐Gómez, D., & Castro‐Ceacero, D. (2026). Intergenerational Communication in the Workplace Among Teaching Staff at Universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 80(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70078
Mikušková, E. B. (2023). Generational Differences in Teachers’ Professional Competencies. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(4), 1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1657
Muncada, F. (2025). Intergenerational Leadership Styles and Practices of Millennial and Gen Z Educators in K-12 Schools: Foundation for Development Plan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 42(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.420202
Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7
Nkambule, B., & Mashiane-Nkabinde, B. (2025). Principals’ Intergenerational Knowledge-Sharing Practices in a Professional Learning Community: A Case of a South African Education Circuit. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0006
Pishchik, Postnikova, Verzhybok, & Gavrilova. (2019). Generational predictors of styles of teachers’ interaction. SHS Web of Conferences, 70(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197006007
Raslie, H. (2021). Gen Y and Gen Z Communication Style. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4268
Razi, N. F. M., Baharun, N., & Masrom, S. (2024). Efficiency in academic evaluation: data envelopment analysis systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(4), 2450–2462. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.26956
Ryan, C., Romnick, R. S., Tony, Z., Romnick, S. R., & Tony, Z. (2025). Generational Cohorts as Correlates to Working Values among Selected Public Secondary Teachers: Insights for Policy Implications across Generations. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(14), 1704–1722. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00128
Schullery, N. M. (2013). Workplace Engagement and Generational Differences in Values. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913476543
Suyitno, I., Fawzi, A., & Arista, H. D. (2025). Language attitudes of Generation Z in responding to teacher questions in learning interactions. CoDAS, 37(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250098en
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
Ventura, S. P., & Yango, A. R. (2023). Leading from within: Understanding the lived experience of Gen X school heads in a digitalized world. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 44, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8948
Watkins, H. J., & Omilion-Hodges, L. M. (2025). Zooming in on Generational Differences: Exploring Intergenerational Employee Relationships and the Rise of Generation Z in the Workplace. International Journal of Business Communication, 25(6), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251345809
Watson, S. L. (2018). Exploring Generational Differences in Communication Styles and Work Values Among Teachers in South Texas. Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application (4th ed.). In Journal of Applied Communications (Vol. 102, Issue 3). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1223
Yabut, M. (2025). Communication styles, cultural diversity practices and classroom management techniques of millennial teachers. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences), 4(2), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS040297
Copyright (c) 2026 Dina Puspita, Muhammad Kristiawan, Eko Risdianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
1.png)
_(3).png){kind=small}
