From Passive Bystander to Active Defender: Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning In Transforming Students' Prosocial Behavior In Civic Education

  • Dhimas Wahyu Pradana Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Isnarmi Moeis Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Junaidi Indrawadi Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Hasrul Piliang Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Keywords: Active defender, Bystander effect, Civic education, Project-based learning, Prosocial behavior, Social cognitive theory

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in promoting the transformation of students' prosocial behavior from passive bystander to active defender in a Civic Education context. The study was motivated by the dominance of passive bystander behavior in Class IX J of SMP Negeri 5 Cilacap, Indonesia, characterized by zero defender action (0%) in pre-intervention observations. A Classroom Action Research (CAR) design following Kemmis and McTaggart (2014) was applied across two cycles with 32 students as subjects. Data were collected via observation rubrics measuring five indicators, field notes, interviews, and cognitive tests, analyzed through descriptive statistics and triangulation. Results demonstrated significant improvements in mean prosocial behavior from 77% (Cycle I) to 89.74% (Cycle II), with aspect-specific gains: cooperation +24.62%, initiative and leadership +16.63%, empathy +9.44%, responsibility +9.44%, and defender action +3.69%. Mean cognitive learning scores increased from 76.25 to 88.75. Analysis through Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and Salmivalli's Participant Role Approach revealed that individual accountability and role simulation simultaneously activated self-efficacy development, moral disengagement reduction, and observational learning. From a Civic Education perspective, this transformation empirically realizes the concept of justice-oriented citizenship as theorized by Westheimer and Kahne (2004) and the civic dispositions framework of Branson (1998). A critical validity discussion explicitly addressed five internal validity threats and four causality arguments, positioning this study as a methodologically transparent contribution to prosocial behavior intervention research.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.‎

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.‎

Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral ‎Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322‎

Bahrudin, A., Muchtar, A., Romli SA, R. S., Hidayatullah, H., & Afryansyah, A. (2024). Evolution of tafsir ‎approaches in Islamic studies. Studi Multidisipliner: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 11(2), 481–496. ‎https://doi.org/10.24952/multidisipliner.v11i2.13676‎

Blaisdell, M., Haslip, M. J., Meehan, S., & Harrington, N. (2024). Teaching for sustainability and altruism ‎through project-based learning: A framework and case study. Journal of Moral Education, 1–23. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2416680‎

Branson, M. S. (1998). The role of civic education. Center for Civic Education.‎

Campbell, M., Hand, K., Shaw, T., Runions, K., Burns, S., Lester, L., & Cross, D. (2023). Adolescent proactive ‎bystanding versus passive bystanding responses to school bullying: The role of peer and moral ‎predictors. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 5(4), 296–305. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00075-2‎

Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. ‎Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440‎

Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive ‎bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–105. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002‎

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge ‎University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851‎

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public ‎sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. ‎‎559–603). SAGE Publications.‎

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory ‎action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2‎

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving ‎Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733‎

Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2023). Annual report KPAI 2022: Data on violence and bullying in ‎educational settings. KPAI.‎

Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the ‎learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. ‎https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018‎

Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.‎

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam ‎Books.‎

Mansoor, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2025). Fostering eco-friendly behaviors in hospitality: Engaging ‎customers through green practices, social influence, and personal dynamics. International Journal of ‎Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(5), 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2024-‎‎1023‎

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). ‎SAGE Publications.‎

Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI ‎literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of ‎Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411‎

Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention ‎programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375‎

Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of ‎personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), ‎‎815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9‎

Prastyo, D., Soetjipto, B. E., Hadi, S., & Sapto, A. S. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and ‎multicultural learning on prosocial behavior in elementary school students. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal ‎Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 8(5), 1312–1319. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v8i5.6204‎

Rahmania, T. (2024). Exploring school environmental psychology in children and adolescents: The influence ‎of environmental and psychosocial factors on sustainable behavior in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(18), ‎Article e37881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37881‎

Ramadhan, R. N., & Agustiar. (2026). Madrasah Berbagi Program as project-based learning for empathy and ‎social responsibility. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 30(2), 326–343. ‎https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v30i2.34112‎

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007‎

Salmivalli, C., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group ‎process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, ‎‎22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291098-‎‎2337%281996%2922%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-AB1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-T

Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, ‎defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & ‎Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090‎

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary ‎Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832‎

Shvets, T., Shestakova, S., Kryvoshlykov, S., Lohvynenko, V., & Butrynovska, U. (2024). Enhancing students’ ‎social abilities via cooperative learning and project-based teaching methods: Pedagogical approaches ‎and beneficial outcomes. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(Special Issue), Article e2024spe022. ‎https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe022‎

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.‎

UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO Publishing.‎

Umar, Jayanti, M. I., Kadir, A., Firdaus, A. Y., Retnoningsih, & Rafiuddin. (2025). Mapping trends in research ‎on the enhancement of students’ social skills and prosocial behavior: A systematic literature review. ‎Educational Process: International Journal, 14(1), Article e2025070. ‎https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.70‎

Wardani, A. K. (2023). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap karakter gotong ‎royong dan tanggung jawab sosial peserta didik SMP. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1), 112–125.‎

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American ‎Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237‎

Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Shi, L. (2023). Defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement on social support and ‎bystander behaviors among primary school students: A multilevel moderated mediation model. ‎Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 36, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00253-3‎

Yang, W., Li, H., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2025). Tailoring AI agents for early learning: The Creative Project Approach. ‎Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100473. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100473‎

Yayasan Semai Jiwa Amini. (2022). National survey on bullying prevalence in Indonesian primary and ‎secondary education. Yayasan Semai Jiwa Amini.‎

Ye, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, M., & Long, S. (2025). Synergizing AI and collaborative learning: A new approach to ‎Chinese character acquisition in lower elementary education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–‎‎20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2528096

Published
2026-04-25
How to Cite
Pradana, D. W., Moeis, I., Indrawadi, J., & Piliang, H. (2026). From Passive Bystander to Active Defender: Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning In Transforming Students’ Prosocial Behavior In Civic Education. JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia, 6(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.62159/jpi.v6i1.2056
Section
Articles