Mapping Intercultural Dialogue Networks In Multicultural Schools: A Social Network Analysis Of Teachers, Students, And Community Actors

  • Agustina Tri Wijayanti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Taryatman Taryatman Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Zaenal Abidin Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI
  • Husni Thamrin Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Rizal Bakti Universitas Global Jakarta
Keywords: Intercultural Dialogue, Social Network ‎Analysis, Multicultural Schools, Teachers, Community Actors

Abstract

Intercultural dialogue in multicultural schools is sustained by relational ties among teachers, students, school leaders, and community actors, yet its structural configuration remains insufficiently mapped in Indonesian school contexts. This study addresses this gap by applying a hybrid Systematic Literature Review and Social Network Analysis (SLR-SNA) approach to identify central actors, brokers, communities, and structural vulnerabilities in intercultural dialogue networks. Literature was retrieved from Scopus and Google Scholar using database-specific search strings on intercultural dialogue, multicultural schooling, school actors, and network relations. Following PRISMA-compliant screening of publications from 2020 to 2025, 32 articles were retained. Actor-programme relationships were extracted through a predefined codebook and transformed into a two-mode matrix comprising 55 nodes and 161 undirected, unweighted edges. The network was analysed in Gephi 0.10.1 using degree, betweenness, closeness, bridging coefficient, and Louvain modularity. Results: Four communities emerged: Teacher Actors (C0), Student Actors (C1), Community Actors (C2), and School Leadership (C3). School Leadership occupied the most dominant brokerage position, with the School Principal recording the highest degree (17) and betweenness centrality (102.40). Student actors showed the strongest intercommunity connectivity, whereas community actors had high bridging coefficients but low integration, indicating unrealised bridging potential. The network density was 0.109 and modularity reached Q = 0.524, indicating a sparse and fragmented dialogue ecosystem. These findings reveal a leadership-dominated, student-intermediated, and community-marginalised network architecture. Strengthening intercultural dialogue therefore requires institutionalising community participation, distributing student bridging roles, and reducing excessive dependence on school leadership.

References

Abdigapbarova, U., Arzymbetova, S., Imankulova, M., Zhiyenbayeva, N., & Tapalova, O. (2026). Monitoring ‎virtual interactions of teachers and students in social networks. International Journal of Human–‎Computer Interaction, 42(2), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2518353‎

Abdulla, M. M., & Ali, A. M. M. (2025). Intercultural sensitivity, challenges, and perceived value in ‎multicultural group work among third-year medical students at Alexandria University, Egypt (2023–‎‎2024). BMC Medical Education, 25, Article 1038. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07597-7‎

Abdullah, M. (2018). Waqf, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and maqasid al-shariah. International ‎Journal of Social Economics, 45(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2016-0295‎

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public ‎Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032‎

Apple, M. W. (2019). Ideology and curriculum (4th ed.). Routledge.‎

Aristiati, F. (2025). Analysis of the role of MI teachers in developing students’ social-emotional character in ‎the digital age: A literature review. ALSYS, 5(6), 2135–2144. ‎https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v5i6.7654‎

Azra, A. (2006). Indonesia, Islam, and democracy: Dynamics in a global context. Equinox Publishing.‎

Bangura, J. B. (2025). Intercultural liberal dialogue. In African Pentecostalism in Catholic Belgium (pp. 85–‎‎102). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216198161.0010‎

Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). ‎Routledge.‎

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2024). Agama di Indonesia 2024.‎

Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation ‎and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321829‎

Cruz, A. B. (2021). Post-primary school students’ attitudes toward physical education and physical activity ‎preferences: Philippines’ K-12 program. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5), 507–517. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00598-2‎

Cutley, P. L., & Okojie, F. A. (2025). The perceptions of preservice teachers on culturally responsive teaching ‎through the lens of Geneva Gay framework. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(01), 77–‎‎96. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1201.18147‎

Daly, A. J. (Ed.). (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Harvard Education Press.‎

Defor, S., Mukinda, F. K., Bocoum, F. Y., Johnson, E., Agyepong, I. A., & Lehmann, U. (2025). Peer-learning and ‎support among health policy and systems research actors in West Africa: A social network analysis. ‎Health Research Policy and Systems, 23, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01417-6‎

Díaz-Pacheco, C., Vergara-Reyes, C., & Conejeros-Solar, M. L. (2025). Sensibilidad intercultural del ‎profesorado hacia el colectivo inmigrante: Una investigación mixta con tres escuelas públicas. Revista ‎Española de Pedagogía, 83(291), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4345‎

Foshay, A. W. (1992). Ideology and curriculum by Michael W. Apple [Review of the book Ideology and ‎curriculum, by M. W. Apple]. The Educational Forum, 56(1), 77–80. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729109335179‎

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College ‎Press.‎

Gorski, P. C. (2016). Rethinking the role of “culture” in educational equity: From cultural competence to ‎equity literacy. Multicultural Perspectives, 18(4), 221–226. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1228344‎

Grant, C. A., & Grant, P. (2025). An argument for intercultural and multicultural education in a time of ESD ‎and international migration. In Intercultural education, curriculum development, assessment and ‎teaching (pp. 107–128). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032723402-12‎

Guzzon, S. (2025). Digital social reading activities with upper secondary EFL students. In Mediating social ‎challenges (pp. 195–208). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839472774-011‎

Haaand, R., & Elham, A. Z. (2025). The relationship between cross-cultural communication apprehension, ‎loneliness, and social connectedness: A moderated mediation analyses among Afghan students in ‎China. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 54(3), 168–186. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2025.2498655‎

He, L. (2025). Effects of multicultural education implementation on intercultural competence: A cross-‎national policy-informed study. Frontiers in Educational Research, 8(11). ‎https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.081124‎

Irsyaad, A. M., Mashudi, M., Nawangsari, D., & Aniaty, A. (2025). Strategies of Islamic education teachers in ‎instilling multicultural values in students. Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, ‎‎8(01), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.30868/im.v8i01.7724‎

Jeremiah, O., & Opanga, D. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives on students’ utilization of electronic devices for ‎accessing learning materials in public secondary schools, Dodoma Region. Journal of Research ‎Innovation and Implications in Education. https://doi.org/10.59765/vhf92s

Jones, J.-K., & Dinh, H. (2025). Support model to promote college opportunities for TRIO multicultural ‎multilingual students in rural. In Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development (pp. 1–‎‎38). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3506-2.ch001‎

Judijanto, L. (2025). Exploring the role of teachers in multicultural and interdisciplinary education: A review. ‎In Educational sciences: Perspectives and interdisciplinary practices. Seven Editora. ‎https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2025.019-023‎

Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025a). Intercultural dialogue in faith-based organizations: Principles, practices, and ‎global lessons. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cr-cl-‎cm-fth-cm-05‎

Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025b). Teaching paper: Intercultural dialogue guide. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit ‎Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-crcl-cm-fth-cm-tp-03‎

Khoramaki, Z., Safaei, L., Ghahremani, L., & Nazari, M. (2025). The impact of social skills education ‎intervention on self-efficacy in female primary school students: A semi-experimental study. ‎Psychology in the Schools, 62(5), 1598–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23411‎

Liow, J. C. (2009). Islam, education and reform in Southern Thailand: Tradition and transformation. ISEAS ‎Publishing.‎

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan ‎Kepala BSKAP Nomor 009/H/KR/2022 tentang Dimensi, Elemen, dan Subelemen Profil Pelajar ‎Pancasila pada Kurikulum Merdeka.‎

Musyarrofi, W. A., & Rofiq, M. (2025). Implementation of multicultural Islamic education values in schools in ‎Indonesia: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, ‎Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities, 3(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v3i2.1405‎

Narimani, A., & Barberà, E. (2025). Clustering students based on online learning interactions using social ‎network analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 20(2), 36–50. ‎https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v20i02.54517‎

Nattheeraphong, A., Ünlü, Z., & Wattanavorakijkul, N. (2025). Navigating the complexities of intercultural ‎sensitivity: A qualitative study of Thai undergraduate students’ developmental journeys. LEARN ‎Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 288–316. ‎https://doi.org/10.70730/doyr9347‎

Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2018). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (7th ed.). ‎Pearson.‎

Noor, I., Danar, O. R., & Wahyudi, L. E. (2023). Local government collaborative innovation policy. Public ‎Policy and Administration, 22(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.22.3.33347‎

Patacsil, F. F., & De Guzman, K. D. (2025). Analyzing students and subjects interactions through social ‎network analysis: A predictive analysis on students’ retention. International Journal of Applied ‎Mathematics, Computational Science and Systems Engineering, 7, 173–179. ‎https://doi.org/10.37394/232026.2025.7.14‎

Praszkier, R. (2025). The “network effect” in management: Social network analysis (SNA). Journal of Positive ‎Management, 16(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.12775/jpm.2025.003‎

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. ‎Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. ‎https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015‎

Purwanto, A. (2025). Dynamics of principals’ complexity leadership towards teachers’ digital transformation ‎in high schools. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-‎‎2025-23.1.00247‎

Raihani. (2018). Education for multicultural citizens in Indonesia: Policies and practices. Compare: A Journal ‎of Comparative and International Education, 48(6), 992–1009. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1399250‎

Siriphon, A., & Yamthap, S. (2018). Contesting “Chinese” education. In Southeast Asian education in modern ‎history (pp. 69–82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161211-6‎

Sleeter, C. E. (2018). Multicultural education past, present, and future: Struggles for dialog and power-‎sharing. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 20(1), 5–20. ‎https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v20i1.1663‎

Tajima, A., & Jiang, Y. (2025). An educational program addressing tense intercultural communication ‎between Japanese and Chinese students: A Bakhtinian perspective on dialogue and love. Dialogic ‎Pedagogy: A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2025.601‎

UNESCO. (2025a). Dialogue for prevention: Intercultural dialogue for conflict transformation brief series. ‎https://doi.org/10.54678/umae2365‎

UNESCO. (2025b). Dialogue for social cohesion: Intercultural dialogue for conflict transformation brief series. ‎https://doi.org/10.54678/ESDS9308‎

Wahed, S., & Anwer, M. (2025). Effect of early literacy skills on students’ academic achievement at primary ‎schools of District Narowal. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 9(1). ‎https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2025(9-I)54‎

Ward, C., Tregoning, M., & de Villiers, R. (2025). Intercultural competence. In Teaching and learning in ‎international schools (pp. 201–219). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781041057314-17‎

Zinilli, A. (2025). Advanced methods in social network analysis. Instats Inc. ‎https://doi.org/10.61700/bq1xxqdq023vo1701‎

Published
2026-06-10
How to Cite
Wijayanti, A. T., Taryatman, T., Abidin, Z., Thamrin, H., & Bakti, R. (2026). Mapping Intercultural Dialogue Networks In Multicultural Schools: A Social Network Analysis Of Teachers, Students, And Community Actors. JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia, 6(2), ‎42–59. https://doi.org/10.62159/jpi.v6i2.2122