Assessment Model Development Based on Taxonomy Marzano In Learning Pancasila Education
Abstract
This The purpose of this study was to create a model for assessing the Pancasila Education learning process using Marzano's Taxonomy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the model. This study used a research and development approach. The test subjects were teachers, principals, and supervisors. Questionnaires and observation sheets functioned as data collection tools. The development process consisted of four stages: (1) initial study; (2) development planning and validation; (3) testing; and (4) product finalization. The experiment was conducted in three stages, with the number of participants increasing at each step. The assessment instruments included; learning design assessment tools, learning implementation, and assessment implementation. Content validity was tested using Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Factor analysis was used to determine construct validity, while the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate its reliability. The results showed that the application of the Marzano Taxonomy assessment model was relevant to activity-based Pancasila Education learning. Teachers and practitioners believe that the assessment paradigm based on Marzano's Taxonomy is useful in the practice of Pancasila Education learning.
References
Anwar, S. (2016). The Role of Islamic Education in Shaping the Nation’s Character. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 157–170.
Arifin, Z. (2016). Learning Evaluation (Principles, Techniques and Procedures). Bandung: PT Teen Rosda Karya.
Astuti, KS (2010). Development of a junior high school arts and culture learning evaluation model. Journal of Education , 40(1).
Febriana, R. (2019). Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Handayani, H., & Indartono, S. (2016). The Implementation of Multicultural Character Education. International Conference on Ethics of Business, Economic and Social Science. Journal of Education, 508-518.
Hermino, A. (2014). Character-Based Curriculum Management. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kurniawan, M. A. (2023). CHAPTER 5 Financial Management in Education: Promoting Equity, Transparency, and Institutional Accountability. Islamic Education Management: Philosophy, Basic Concepts, and Practical Implementation, 123.
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Clasroon instruction that’s words. New York: McRE.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2006). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). Praise for the Second Edition of The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Second Edi). Corwin Press A Sage Publications Company.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). Praise for the Second Edition of The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Second Edi). Corwin Press A Sage Publications Company.
Nugroho, RA (2018). HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills: Concepts, Learning, Assessment, and Questions). Jakarta: PT.
Nuhamara, D. (2018). Prioritizing Character Dimensions in Christian Religious Education. Jurnal Jaffray, 16(1), 93–115.
Pattaro, C. (2016). Character Education: themes and research of an academic literature review. Journal of Sociology of Education , 8 (1), 6-30.
Pratiwi, H., & Ismaniati, C. (2017). Development of Learning Multimedia to Develop Children's Cognitive Aspects. Journal of Educational Technology Innovation , 4(2).
Riyanto, Y. (2010). Educational Research Methodology. Surabaya: SIC Publisher.
Saraswati, PM, & Agustika, GN (2020). High-Level Thinking Skills in Solving HOTS Problems in Mathematics Subjects. Undiksha Elementary School Scientific Journal, 4(2).
Silay, N. (2014). Another type of character education: citizenship education. International Journal.
Sugianti, L., & Sariyasa AAI Marhaeni, AA (2018). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning Models on High-Order Thinking Skills and Questioning Skills in Mathematics Learning for Grade V Elementary Schools. PENDASI. Indonesian Elementary Education Journal , 2(1), 35-46.
Sugiyono, P. (2011). Mixed Methods Research Methods. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, P. (2019). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Utami, DA, & Wardani, NS (2020). Development of Cognitive Assessment Instruments in Thematic Learning for Grade 5 Elementary School. Scientific Journal of Education, 20(2), 1–18.
Wibowo. (2012). Performance Management (3rd Edition). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Winarno. (2014). Citizenship Education Learning. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Yunus, M. (2015). Teachers’ Efforts to Shape National Character in Early Childhood Through the Learning Process at the Raudatul Athfal (RA) Fathun Qarib Foundation. Serambi Akademica Journal, 3(2).
Copyright (c) 2026 Hermi Yanzi, Ana Mentari Ana Mentari, Rohman Rohman, Elisa Seftiyana Elisa Seftiyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
1.png)
_(3).png){kind=small}
