Evidence-Based and Stakeholder-Oriented Decision-Making in Organizations: A Conceptual Study on Organizational Effectiveness, Legitimacy, and Sustainability
Abstract
This study aims to examine the conceptual foundations, processes, determinants, and stakeholder implications of organizational decision-making. A qualitative conceptual literature review was employed by synthesizing relevant scholarly literature on management, leadership, organizational behavior, and stakeholder management. The findings indicate that organizational decision-making is not limited to selecting an alternative but involves identifying problems, gathering relevant information, developing and evaluating alternatives, implementing decisions, and assessing outcomes. Decision quality is influenced by information accuracy, leadership competence, organizational culture and structure, resource availability, technological developments, and internal and external environmental conditions. The review also shows that stakeholder-oriented decision-making is essential for strengthening organizational legitimacy, public trust, and support for policy implementation. Conversely, decisions made without adequate information, contextual analysis, and stakeholder consideration may lead to resistance, conflict, inefficiency, and reputational risks. This study concludes that systematic, evidence-informed, participatory, and ethically grounded decision-making is essential for improving organizational effectiveness, responding to uncertainty, and supporting long-term sustainability.
References
Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: A systematic literature review. Management Decision, 59(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006
Ahmad, M., Wu, Q., Naveed, M., & Ali, S. (2022). Probing the impact of cognitive heuristics on strategic decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(10), 1532–1550. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2021-0636
Al-Kahtani, S. M., Senan, N. A. M., Alanazi, I. D., Badawi, M., & Almulaiki, W. A. (2024). Exploring strategic decision making as a mediator between enterprise resource planning, innovation, strategic planning, and organizational performance. Discover Sustainability, 5, 305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00532-8
Al-Surmi, A., Bashiri, M., & Koliousis, I. (2022). AI-based decision making: Combining strategies to improve operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4464–4486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1966540
Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M., & Haridy, S. (2020). The relationship between leadership styles and organisational innovation: A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 338–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339
Alosani, M. S., Yusoff, R. Z., & Al-Dhaafri, H. S. (2020). The effect of innovation and strategic planning on enhancing organizational performance of Dubai Police. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2018-0039
Alzghoul, A., Khaddam, A. A., Abousweilem, F., Irtaimeh, H. J., & Alshaar, Q. (2024). How business intelligence capability impacts decision-making speed, comprehensiveness, and firm performance. Information Development, 40(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221108438
Andréfouët, S., Paul, M., & Farhan, A. R. (2022). Indonesia’s 13,558 islands: A new census from space and a first step towards a One Map for Small Islands Policy. Marine Policy, 135, 104848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104848
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Awad, J. A. R., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2024). Digital transformation influence on organisational resilience through organisational learning and innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00405-4
Bendell, B. L., & Huvaj, M. N. (2020). Does stakeholder engagement through corporate social and environmental behaviors affect innovation? Journal of Business Research, 119, 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.028
Billiet, A., Bruneel, J., & Dufays, F. (2025). Exit, voice, or both: Why organizations engage with stakeholders. Business & Society, 64(6), 1149–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231182612
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2022). Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0441
Chernyi, A., & Uotila, J. (2024). Prioritization of organizational stakeholders: A managerial decision-making perspective. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114882
Clark, E. C., Burnett, T., Blair, R., Traynor, R. L., Hagerman, L., & Dobbins, M. (2024). Strategies to implement evidence-informed decision making at the organizational level: A rapid systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10841-3
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
Cosa, M., & Torelli, R. (2024). Digital transformation and flexible performance management: A systematic literature review of the evolution of performance measurement systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00409-9
Dalglish, S. L., Khalid, H., & McMahon, S. A. (2020). Document analysis in health policy research: The READ approach. Health Policy and Planning, 35(10), 1424–1431. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064
Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0315
Dmytriyev, S. D., Freeman, R. E., & Hörisch, J. (2021). The relationship between stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1441–1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12684
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data: Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
Ghasemaghaei, M., Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.10.001
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Hedayatipour, M., Etemadi, S., Hekmat, S. N., & Moosavi, A. (2024). Challenges of using evidence in managerial decision-making of the primary health care system. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10409-7
Hristov, I., & Appolloni, A. (2022). Stakeholders’ engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies’ performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders’ practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1488–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2965
Hung, B. Q., Hoa, T. A., Hoai, T. T., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Advancement of cloud-based accounting effectiveness, decision-making quality, and firm performance through digital transformation and digital leadership: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Heliyon, 9(6), e16929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16929
Janati, A., Hasanpoor, E., Hajebrahimi, S., & Sadeghi-Bazargani, H. (2018). Evidence-based management: Healthcare manager viewpoints. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 31(5), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0143
Kraus, S., Bouncken, R. B., & Yela Aránega, A. (2024). The burgeoning role of literature review articles in management research: An introduction and outlook. Review of Managerial Science, 18(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00729-1
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Lange, D., Bundy, J., & Park, E. (2022). The social nature of stakeholder utility. Academy of Management Review, 47(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0456
Linzalone, R., Ammirato, S., Felicetti, A. M., Corvello, V., & Santarsiero, F. (2024). Exploring stakeholder engagement network behavior: Strategic and managerial implications for corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(4), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12692
Litvaj, I., Ponisciakova, O., Stancekova, D., Svobodova, J., & Mrazik, J. (2022). Decision-making procedures and their relation to knowledge management and quality management. Sustainability, 14(1), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010572
López-Concepción, A., Gil-Lacruz, A. I., & Saz-Gil, I. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, CSR development and SDGs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2170
Lyhne, C. N., Thisted, J., & Bjerrum, M. (2025). Qualitative content analysis: Framing the analytical process of inductive content analysis to develop a sound study design. Quality & Quantity, 59, 5329–5349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02220-9
Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
Meydan, C. H., & Akkaş, H. (2024). The role of triangulation in qualitative research: Converging perspectives. In A. Elhami, A. Roshan, & H. Chandan (Eds.), Principles of conducting qualitative research in multicultural settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3306-8.ch006
Moshood, T. D., Rotimi, J. O. B., & Shahzad, W. (2025). Impact of information quality on strategic decision-making in construction organization: Unravelling complexity and contingencies. Management Research Review, 48(4), 578–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2024-0422
Mosley, J. E., & Wong, J. (2021). Decision-making in collaborative governance networks: Pathways to input and throughput legitimacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa044
Naveed, R. T., Alhaidan, H., Al Halbusi, H., & Al-Swidi, A. K. (2022). Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: Pivotal role of organizational resistance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100178
Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2018). The normative justification of integrative stakeholder engagement: A Habermasian view on responsible leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(3), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.33
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Pittenger, L. M., Glassman, A. M., Mumbower, S., Merritt, D. M., & Bollenback, D. (2023). Bounded rationality: Managerial decision-making and data. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(4), 890–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2111380
Rahimnia, F., & Molavi, H. (2021). A model for examining the effects of communication on innovation performance: Emphasis on the intermediary role of strategic decision-making speed. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0293
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Roundy, P. T., Harrison, D. A., Khavul, S., Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., & McGee, J. E. (2018). Entrepreneurial alertness as a pathway to strategic decisions and organizational performance. Strategic Organization, 16(2), 192–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017693970
Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Making evidence-based organizational decisions in an uncertain world. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.05.001
Rousseau, D. M., & ten Have, S. (2022). Evidence-based change management. Organizational Dynamics, 51(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2022.100899
Rubio-Andrés, M., Linuesa-Langreo, J., Gutiérrez-Broncano, S., & Sastre-Castillo, M. A. (2025). Tackling digital transformation strategy: How it affects firm innovation and organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50, 1103–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10164-9
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
Shrestha, Y. R., Krishna, V., & von Krogh, G. (2021). Augmenting organizational decision-making with deep learning algorithms: Principles, promises, and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 123, 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.068
Sinnaiah, T., Adam, S., & Mahadi, B. (2023). A strategic management process: The role of decision-making style and organisational performance. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2022-0074
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stanikzai, M. E., & others. (2025). Strategic alignment of organizational structure based on decisions: A bibliometric-systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2560650
Subburaman, G.-B. B., Gupta, S., Ravilla, T., Mertens, H., Webers, C. A. B., van den Biggelaar, F. J. H. M., van Zuilen, M., Sundar, B., & van Merode, F. (2025). Evaluating the adoption of evidence-based management practices in eye hospitals. Healthcare, 13(3), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030222
Swalih, M. M., Ram, R., & Tew, E. (2024). Environmental management accounting for strategic decision-making: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6335–6367. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3828
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Wenzel, M., Stanske, S., & Lieberman, M. B. (2021). Strategic responses to crisis. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2), O16–O27. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3161
Wenzel, M., Trittin-Ulbrich, H., Edinger-Schons, L. M., Castelló, I., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2025). Toward holistic stakeholder engagement: Integrating participation, inclusion, and democracy. Business & Society, 64(6), 1055–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503251341209
Yadav, P., & Jain, A. (2023). Sustainability disclosures and corporate boards: A stakeholder approach to decision-making. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2022-0279
Yu, H., Shang, Y., Wang, N., & Ma, Z. (2019). The mediating effect of decision quality on knowledge management and firm performance for Chinese entrepreneurs: An empirical study. Sustainability, 11(13), 3660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133660
Yu, X., Stuart, A. L., Liu, Y., Ivey, C. E., Russell, A. G., Kan, H., Henneman, L. R. F., Sarnat, S. E., Hasan, S., Sadmani, A., Yang, X., & Yu, H. (2019). On the accuracy and potential of Google Maps location history data to characterize individual mobility for air pollution health studies. Environmental Pollution, 252, 924–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.081
Copyright (c) 2026 Saripuddin Daulay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JPI: Jurnal Pustaka Indonesia journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
1.png)



